[2024] KEHC 504 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 504 (KLR)

The High Court held that the appeal was filed outside the thirty-day period stipulated under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, and no leave was sought to file the appeal out of time. The Small Claims Court Act does not provide for a different timeline, so the Civil Procedure Act applies. As a result, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 504 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Al-Rahim Tradin Limited; Respondent: Robinas Oyara Makana; Respondent: Saadi Cars (K) Limited; Respondent: Davejay Kanak t/a Jeds Motors Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E203 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Preliminary Jurisdictional Objection
Outcome
Appeal and application struck out for want of jurisdiction; file closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Jurisdiction of High Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Jurisdiction of High Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Al-Rahim Tradin Limited

Appellant

Robinas Oyara Makana

Respondent

Saadi Cars (K) Limited

Respondent

Davejay Kanak t/a Jeds Motors Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Preliminary Jurisdictional Objection

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal filed out of time without leave under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay of execution is competent where the appeal itself is incompetent.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that the appeal was filed outside the thirty-day period stipulated under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, and no leave was sought to file the appeal out of time. The Small Claims Court Act does not provide for a different timeline, so the Civil Procedure Act applies. As a result, the appeal and the accompanying application for stay of execution were incompetently filed, and the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain them. The court struck out both the memorandum of appeal and the notice of motion, with liberty to the applicant to file an appropriate application afresh.

Court Disposition

Appeal and application struck out for want of jurisdiction; file closed.

Orders

  • The Memorandum of Appeal dated 30th November 2023 and Notice of Motion dated 30th November 2023 are struck out as incompetently filed.
  • No orders as to costs.