[2024] KEELC 7069 (KLR)
The court found that the appeal was filed outside the statutory thirty-day period mandated by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. There was no evidence that the appellant had sought or obtained leave to file the appeal out of time. Additionally, the lower court suit had already been compromised by a consent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 7069 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohammed Said Alambo; Respondent: Ricord Investments; Respondent: Charles Ochome; Respondent: Silvester Oluoch
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E036 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out as incompetent.
- Judges
- E Asati
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Filing Deadlines, Consent Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Said Alambo
Appellant
Ricord Investments
Respondent
Charles Ochome
Respondent
Silvester Oluoch
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
- 2 Whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal filed out of time without leave.
- 3 Whether the compromise of the lower court suit by consent order affected the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appeal was filed outside the statutory thirty-day period mandated by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. There was no evidence that the appellant had sought or obtained leave to file the appeal out of time. Additionally, the lower court suit had already been compromised by a consent order and the file closed. Consequently, the appeal was deemed incompetent and was struck out with costs to the respondents.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out as incompetent.
Orders
- The appeal is hereby struck out.
- Costs to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Alambo v Ricord Investments & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E036 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7069 (KLR) (24 October 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 7069 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Environment and Land Appeal E036 of 2022
E Asati, J
October 24, 2024
Between
Mohammed Said Alambo
Appellant
and
Ricord Investments
1st Respondent
Charles Ochome
2nd Respondent
Silvester Oluoch
3rd Respondent
(Being an appeal from the ruling of the Senior Principal Magistrate (Hon. K Cheruiyot) in CMCC ELC CASE NO. 165 OF 2021 – Ricord Investments -vs- Charles Ochome, Silvester Oluoch))
Judgment
1. Vide the Memorandum of appeal dated 15th September 2022, the appellant filed the present appeal against the ruling of the trial court in Ksm CMCC ELC case No 165 of 2021.
2. The appellant seeks that the appeal be allowed, the order of the trial court be set aside and be replaced by an order allowing the appellant’s application before the trial court.
3. Though the date of the ruling appealed against is not indicated in the Memorandum of Appeal, the heading of the Record of Appeal indicates that the ruling appealed against is the one delivered on 8th June 2022. The Memorandum of Appeal dated 15th September 2022 was filed and received in court on 5th of October 2022 on which date the filing fees in respect thereof of Kshs 1500 was paid.
4. It is clear that the appeal was filed out of time and in contravention of the provisions of section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. Section 79G provides in mandatory terms that appeals from subordinate courts to the High Court shall be filed within a period of thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against. There is no evidence that enlargement of time for filing of the appeal was sought and obtained under the proviso to section 79G.
5. Perusal of the lower court file shows that the suit was compromised by a consent order recorded on 17/11/2022 and the file closed.
6. For the foregoing reasons, I find that the appeal is incompetent. The appeal is hereby struck out. Costs to the Respondents.Orders accordingly.
JUDGEMENT DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU AND DELIVERED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 VIRTUALLY THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE APPLICATION.E. ASATI,JUDGE.In the presence of:Maureen: Court Assistant.R. Odhiambo for the appellant.Nyakongo for the 1st Respondent.