[2002] KEHC 1269 (KLR)
The court found that the identification of the appellant by Pw1 and Pw2 was reliable due to their prior knowledge of him and the circumstances of the robbery, including the presence of light and the appellant's distinctive conduct. The appellant's confession, though retracted, contained details only the perpetrator...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 1269 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Albert Itotia Kornes; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 416 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction for robbery with violence quashed; substituted with conviction for robbery under section 296(1) of the Penal Code; sentence imposed
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha, GP Mbito
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Identification Evidence, Confession Statements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Itotia Kornes
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly identified as one of the robbers during the incident.
- 2 Whether the confession statement by the appellant was admissible and corroborated by other evidence.
- 3 Whether the conviction for robbery with violence was proper or should be substituted with a lesser charge.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the identification of the appellant by Pw1 and Pw2 was reliable due to their prior knowledge of him and the circumstances of the robbery, including the presence of light and the appellant's distinctive conduct. The appellant's confession, though retracted, contained details only the perpetrator would know and was corroborated by the complainants' evidence. The court concluded that there was no mistaken identity and that the appellant's conduct after the offence, including fleeing the area, supported his guilt. However, since no injuries were inflicted during the robbery, the court held that the proper conviction should be for the lesser offence of robbery under...
Court Disposition
conviction for robbery with violence quashed; substituted with conviction for robbery under section 296(1) of the Penal Code; sentence imposed
Orders
- The conviction for robbery with violence under section 296(2) is quashed and substituted with a conviction for robbery under section 296(1).
- The appellant shall serve five years imprisonment together with four strokes of the cane.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
APPELATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 416 OF 1999
From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 2599 of 1997 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Nyahururu.
ALBERT ITOTIA KORNES………..……………………….…APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………………………..…RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The appellant was convicted of the offence of Robbery with violence C/s 296 (2) of the Penal Code and sentenced the mandatory sentence of death. This is an appeal arising from the said conviction.
It is our duty as the first appellate court to assess the entire evidence adduced before the learned trial magistrate and come to independent conclusions. This we have done.
The complainant was robed on the night of 17th and 18th December, 1996. There were several assailants. They were armed with pangas and swords.There was light coming from the several torches that were held by the assailants. At the time of the robbery, the appellant is said to have held a sharp panga on the neck of the complainant Pw1.
The robbers demanded money. Pw1 had Kshs. 19,000 which on demand showed where it was kept. The money was taken alongside several household and personal property. The wife of Pw1 Pw2 was present but was ordered to keep quiet and cover herself. This incident took some time but Pw1 and Pw2 were only able to identify the appellant both by appearance and voice.
The appellant was a son of their neighbour. He used to come to their shop and in fact on the night of the robbery, he had visited the shop to buy some cigarettes. Pw1 had known him for about one year while pw2 had known him for about 3 months.
Our assessment of the evidence is that there could not have been any mistaken identity Pw1 gave his name to the police when he reported the robbery and was honest enough to say he did not know the other assailants.
On the night of the attack after the robbers had left and report made to the police, complainants, and the police went to the home of he appellant but they were told he had left at 11. 00pm and had not returned. The appellant disappeared and it was not until about two months later that he was arrested in Nakuru. The only inference that can be drawn from that conduct is that he knew he was being sought for the crime he had committed.
Upon his arrest, the appellant confessed in his statement under inquiry to the police that he and others committed the offence. The statement contained peculiar details that could only be attributed to the appellant. It was retracted but correctly admitted in evidence by the learned trial magistrate. In any case it was corroborated by the independent evidence of identification by pw1 and Pw2.
The learned trial magistrate correctly rejected the defence raised by he appellant in view of the overwhelming evidence against him.
There was no injury in the whole incident and we believe it is proper that the appellant should have been convicted of the lesser charge of Robbery C/s 296(1) we accordingly substitute the conviction.
The appellant was said to be a first offender but that does not reduce the seriousness of the offence. No recoveries of the stolen money and goods were made. Severe punishment is called for.
We order that the appellant shall serve five(5) years imprisonment together with four (4) strokes of he cane. He shall be under police supervision for a period of five(5) years from the date of completion of his prison term.
Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of July, 2002
MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE
G. MBITO
JUDGE