[2016] KEHC 3557 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3557 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate either overwhelming chances of success in his appeal or the existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances to warrant the grant of bail pending appeal. The court accepted the legal principles that bail pending appeal is not an absolute right and is only...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3557 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Albert Kimathi Mugo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 59 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Defilement Offence, Exceptional Circumstances, Burden of Proof, Sentence Pending Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Appeal Defilement Offence Exceptional Circumstances Burden of Proof Sentence Pending Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Albert Kimathi Mugo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has demonstrated exceptional or unusual circumstances to warrant grant of bail pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success to justify release on bail pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant will have served a substantial part of his sentence before the appeal is heard and determined.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate either overwhelming chances of success in his appeal or the existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances to warrant the grant of bail pending appeal. The court accepted the legal principles that bail pending appeal is not an absolute right and is only available in exceptional circumstances or where the appellant would have served a substantial part of the sentence before the appeal is heard. The court rejected the argument that the absence of a DNA test or the alleged unsatisfactory nature of the medical evidence constituted grounds for bail, holding that defilement can be proved by credible complainant evidence alone. The...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The appellant's application for bail pending appeal is dismissed in its entirety.