[2016] KEHC 6732 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6732 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land and that the defendant had unlawfully trespassed, cut down trees, and destroyed property. The defendant failed to appear or contest the application despite proper service. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff had established a prima...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6732 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Albert Mpuria M'Arimi; Defendant: George Kajogi Muriuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 110 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
Application allowed. Temporary injunction granted as prayed in prayers 2, 3, and 4. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Trespass to Land, Ownership Disputes, Preservation Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Trespass to Land Ownership Disputes Preservation Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Albert Mpuria M'Arimi

Plaintiff

George Kajogi Muriuki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from entering, cutting trees, or disposing of felled trees on the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a likelihood of success.
  3. 3 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy for the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land and that the defendant had unlawfully trespassed, cut down trees, and destroyed property. The defendant failed to appear or contest the application despite proper service. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case, that damages would not be an adequate remedy due to the ongoing risk of loss and volatility, and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff. Accordingly, the court granted the orders sought in prayers 2, 3, and 4 of the application, restraining the defendant from further trespass, ordering preservation of felled trees/logs, and directing the police to...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Temporary injunction granted as prayed in prayers 2, 3, and 4. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining the defendant, his servants, assigns, and representatives from entering upon the plaintiff's parcel L.R. IGOJI/MWERU-11/6 and cutting down trees thereon pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  • Order preventing the defendant, his servants, assigns, representatives, and agents from selling or disposing of the felled trees/logs and directing that the felled trees/logs be preserved at the police station until the application is heard and determined.