[2016] KEHC 4508 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4508 (KLR)

The court held that the plaintiff's application to set aside the eviction order was brought after an inordinate delay of 24 years, which is prejudicial to the defendant and contrary to the principle that litigation must come to an end. The only issue raised by the plaintiff was lack of notice of eviction, which was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 4508 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Albert Obiayo Mwasi; Defendant: Okoro Asikoye
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 189 of 1988
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Eviction Order
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Setting Aside Orders, Finality of Judgments
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Setting Aside Orders Finality of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Albert Obiayo Mwasi

Plaintiff

Okoro Asikoye

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Eviction Order

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to have the eviction order set aside after a lapse of 24 years.
  2. 2 Whether lack of notice of eviction is a sufficient ground to set aside a finalised court order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiff's application to set aside the eviction order was brought after an inordinate delay of 24 years, which is prejudicial to the defendant and contrary to the principle that litigation must come to an end. The only issue raised by the plaintiff was lack of notice of eviction, which was not sufficient to justify setting aside a finalised order, especially when the plaintiff was aware of the order and failed to act within a reasonable time. The court found no merit in the application and dismissed it, emphasizing the need for finality in litigation and the importance of respecting court orders.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 16th June 2016 is dismissed.