[2019] KEHC 11948 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11948 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Kariuki Muruwatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the applicant was unconstitutional. The court considered the applicant's remorse, the absence of injury to victims, and the 14 years already served in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11948 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Afande Salamba; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 497 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Following Supreme Court Decision
Outcome
Applicant to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Mitigation, Death Penalty, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Mitigation Death Penalty Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Afande Salamba

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Following Supreme Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the applicant is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Kariuki Muruwatetu & Another v Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the period already served by the applicant is sufficient punishment given the circumstances of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Kariuki Muruwatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the applicant was unconstitutional. The court considered the applicant's remorse, the absence of injury to victims, and the 14 years already served in custody. It concluded that the period served was sufficient punishment, fulfilling the objectives of deterrence and retribution. Accordingly, the applicant was entitled to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.

Court Disposition

Applicant to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.

Orders

  • The applicant be forthwith set free unless otherwise lawfully held.