[2018] KEELC 491 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 491 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant had established grounds for leave to commence judicial review proceedings, it would not be in the interest of justice to grant a stay of the acquisition process because the applicant had already received partial compensation for the properties in question. The court exercised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 491 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Kadenge Mwendwa; Respondent: The National Land Commission; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Kenya National Highways Authority
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 55 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave and Stay
Outcome
Leave to commence judicial review granted; stay not granted at this stage; directions issued for further proceedings.
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Compensation for Land, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Compulsory Acquisition Compensation for Land Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Kadenge Mwendwa

Applicant

The National Land Commission

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The Kenya National Highways Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave and Stay

  1. 1 Whether leave to commence judicial review proceedings should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether leave should operate as a stay of the acquisition process given partial compensation has been paid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant had established grounds for leave to commence judicial review proceedings, it would not be in the interest of justice to grant a stay of the acquisition process because the applicant had already received partial compensation for the properties in question. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave but declined to order that leave operate as a stay, directing that the issue of stay be addressed in the substantive motion. The court also set timelines for filing and serving the substantive motion and ordered that costs be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Leave to commence judicial review granted; stay not granted at this stage; directions issued for further proceedings.

Orders

  • Leave is hereby granted to the applicant to commence judicial review proceedings.
  • The applicant to file and serve the substantive motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date hereof.