[2021] KEHC 2011 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 2011 (KLR)

The court found that the trial magistrate failed to account for the one year the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing, as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's mitigation did not raise the issue, but the law imposes a duty on the court to consider such period...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 2011 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Mungi Mbugua; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 150 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Sentencing Revision, Pre Sentence Custody, Application of Section 333 2 Cpc
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Sentencing Revision Pre Sentence Custody Application of Section 333 2 Cpc

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Mungi Mbugua

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in custody by the applicant prior to sentencing should be accounted for in the final sentence as per section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial magistrate failed to account for the one year the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing, as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's mitigation did not raise the issue, but the law imposes a duty on the court to consider such period regardless. The High Court held that the omission was an error and revised the sentence to deduct the one year spent in custody from the total imprisonment term imposed by the trial court.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant shall serve his imprisonment term(s) as ordered by the trial court less the period of 1 year that he spent in custody awaiting determination of his case.