[2021] KEHC 5274 (KLR)
The court held that, following the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and the court is empowered to resentence the appellant. Considering the heinous nature of the offence, the use of actual violence, the injury to a victim, and the value...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 5274 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Alex Ochieng; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 133 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Application After Dismissal of Initial Appeal
- Outcome
- resentencing granted; custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Resentencing, Mandatory Sentencing, Constitutional Rights, Rehabilitation, Sentencing Guidelines
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alex Ochieng
Appellant
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Application After Dismissal of Initial Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to resentence where an earlier appeal was dismissed by a court of concurrent jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
- 3 What is the appropriate sentence for the appellant given the circumstances of the offence and time served.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, following the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and the court is empowered to resentence the appellant. Considering the heinous nature of the offence, the use of actual violence, the injury to a victim, and the value of property stolen, but also taking into account the appellant's rehabilitation and the 13 years already served, a definite custodial sentence of 20 years imprisonment, to run from the date of arrest, is appropriate and commensurate with the offence committed.
Court Disposition
resentencing granted; custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- The appellant is resentenced to 20 years imprisonment to run from the date of arrest, 9/6/2007.
- The petition of appeal dated 23.12.2019 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2019
ALEX OCHIENG.............................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Appellant herein ALEX OCHIENG was charged with three counts of the Offence of Robbery with Violence contrary to 296 (2) of the Penal Code.
2. The Appellant had filed an appeal in 2008 in a Criminal Appeal High Court No. 227 of 2008. The Appeal was dismissed. The Appellant is now seeking resentence in this court. However this is a court of equal jurisdiction and cannot sit on appeal on decision of a court with concurrent jurisdiction. Petition of Appeal dated 23. 12. 2019; No. 133 of 2019 is dismissed.
3. The appellant has also approached this court through a Criminal Application filed on 26. 1.2021 seeking for a resentence. He is in this court pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic (2017) eKLRin which the apex Court found the mandatory nature of the death sentence to be unconstitutional.
1. The learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the resentence application.
2. The applicant submitted that he was a first offender and is now fully reformed due to the rehabilitative programs in the prison. He prayed for a definite sentence and if possible be sentenced to time already served.
3. I have considered the submissions. The petitioner was involved in a heinous offence in which he used actual violence and in the process injured someone. He robbed off money and goods all valued at Kshs. 109,800/=.
4. The Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guideslines lists the objectives of sentencing at page 15 paragraph 4. 1 as follows:
Retribution: To punish the offender for his/her criminal conduct in a just manner.
Deterrence: To deter the offender from committing a similar offence subsequently as well as to discourage other people from committing similar offences.
Rehabilitation: To enable the offender reform from his criminal disposition and become a law abiding person.
Restorative Justice: To address the needs arising from the criminal conduct such as loss and damages. Criminal conduct ordinarily occasions victims, communities’ and offenders’ needs and justice demands that these are met. Further, to promote a sense of responsibility through the offender’s contribution towards meeting the victims’ needs.
Community protection: To protect the community by incapacitating the offender.
Denunciation: To communicate the community’s condemnation of the criminal conduct
8. The petitioner has been in prison for 13 years. In my view a definite period of 20 years will be sufficient and commensurate with offence committed. Same to run from the date of his arrest 9/6/2007.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
…………………………..
HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO
JUDGE