[2012] KEHC 3158 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3158 (KLR)

The court determined that, in the interests of justice and to avoid prejudice, the application for leave to apply for judicial review should be served on the respondents and the interested party, allowing them to participate in the proceedings. The court found that no prejudice would be suffered by the applicant if...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 3158 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Ole Magelo as Chairman A.F.C. Leopards Sports Club; Respondent: The Assistant Registrar of Societies; Respondent: The Honourable the Attorney General; Interested Party: Josephat Bukachi as Secretary General A.F.C. Leopards Sports Club
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 4 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Outcome
Application for leave to apply for judicial review to be served on respondents and interested party; all parties to appear for further directions.
Judges
D Schofield
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Leave to Apply, Societies Registration
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Certiorari Prohibition Orders Leave to Apply Societies Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Ole Magelo as Chairman A.F.C. Leopards Sports Club

Applicant

The Assistant Registrar of Societies

Respondent

The Honourable the Attorney General

Respondent

Josephat Bukachi as Secretary General A.F.C. Leopards Sports Club

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether justice requires that the respondents and interested party be heard before leave is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, in the interests of justice and to avoid prejudice, the application for leave to apply for judicial review should be served on the respondents and the interested party, allowing them to participate in the proceedings. The court found that no prejudice would be suffered by the applicant if the respondents and interested party were heard before leave is granted. Therefore, the court ordered that the application for leave be served immediately and that all parties appear before the Judicial Review Division for further directions.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to apply for judicial review to be served on respondents and interested party; all parties to appear for further directions.

Orders

  • The application for leave shall be served on the respondents and the interested party immediately.
  • All parties shall appear before the Honorable Judge in the Judicial Review Division on 16.1.2012 for further directions on the hearing.