[2020] KEHC 1194 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 1194 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in filing the appeal. The applicant did not claim to have requested a copy of the judgment or record, and criminal appeals can be filed and proceedings provided at no cost. The court noted that the applicant had previously filed three...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 1194 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alex Salaiyo Abraham; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 5 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Inordinate Delay, Good Cause Requirement, Criminal Appeals
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Inordinate Delay Good Cause Requirement Criminal Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Salaiyo Abraham

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated good cause to warrant leave to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether poverty constitutes sufficient reason for delay in filing an appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the delay of seven years in seeking leave to appeal is inordinate and inexcusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in filing the appeal. The applicant did not claim to have requested a copy of the judgment or record, and criminal appeals can be filed and proceedings provided at no cost. The court noted that the applicant had previously filed three matters in court at no cost, undermining his claim that poverty prevented him from appealing. The explanation for the seven-year delay was deemed unsatisfactory and the delay inordinate and inexcusable. Consequently, the court held that there was no good cause to admit the appeal out of time or to grant leave to file the appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • All applications for leave to appeal out of time are dismissed.
  • The appeal filed out of time is dismissed.