[2003] KEHC 227 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 227 (KLR)

The court found that the application was properly brought under Section 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act, which allows for exclusion of time required for preparation and delivery of proceedings and judgment when calculating the period for filing an appeal. The applicant had applied for the necessary documents...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] KEHC 227 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alexander Maigwa Mwangi; Respondent: Anne Wamucii Muhihi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Children Miscellaneous Application 55 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Certificate of Delay, Appeals From Subordinate Courts
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Certificate of Delay Appeals From Subordinate Courts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Maigwa Mwangi

Applicant

Anne Wamucii Muhihi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time under Section 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained and excusable.
  3. 3 Whether the application was properly brought under Section 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act instead of Order 49 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was properly brought under Section 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act, which allows for exclusion of time required for preparation and delivery of proceedings and judgment when calculating the period for filing an appeal. The applicant had applied for the necessary documents promptly and received them after a delay certified by the lower court. Excluding this period, the applicant acted within the statutory thirty-day period for filing an appeal. The court was satisfied that there was no inordinate or unexplained delay and that the proceedings and judgment were necessary for the intended appeal. Accordingly, leave to file the appeal out of time was granted.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file his appeal within fifteen days from the date of this ruling.
  • Costs of this application shall be costs in the appeal.