[2014] KEHC 3079 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose all beneficiaries of the deceased's estate in the petition for grant of representation, constituting material non-disclosure under Section 51 of the Law of Succession Act. This omission entitled the court to revoke the grant under Section 76 of the Act. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 3079 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alfayo Ragita Nyasendi; Respondent: John Marwa Nyasendi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 299 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant of representation revoked; fresh grant issued to both parties; no order as to costs
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant of Representation, Revocation of Grant, Material Non Disclosure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfayo Ragita Nyasendi
Applicant
John Marwa Nyasendi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of representation was obtained through material non-disclosure of all beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether the court that issued the grant had jurisdiction given the value of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose all beneficiaries of the deceased's estate in the petition for grant of representation, constituting material non-disclosure under Section 51 of the Law of Succession Act. This omission entitled the court to revoke the grant under Section 76 of the Act. The issue of whether the deceased had distributed part of his estate before death was deemed a matter for determination at the confirmation stage, not at the revocation stage. Accordingly, the court revoked the grant previously issued and ordered that a fresh grant be issued to both the applicant and respondent as joint administrators.
Court Disposition
grant of representation revoked; fresh grant issued to both parties; no order as to costs
Orders
- The grant of representation issued to John Marwa Nyasendi in Kehancha SRM’s Court Succession Cause No. 49 of 2012 on 28th January 2013 and confirmed on 9th September 2013 is revoked.
- The respondent shall return the original certificates of grant to court for cancellation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 299 OF 2014
(FORMERLY KEHANCHA SRM SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 49 OF 2012)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
NYASENDI WAMBURA (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
ALFAYO RAGITA NYASENDI .............................. APPLICANT
AND
JOHN MARWA NYASENDI ……....................... RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
This matter relates to the Estate of Nyasendi Wambura (deceased) who died on 10th May 1987. The application for the grant of representation of his estate was filed by John Marwa Nyasendi, his son, who stated that he had two other siblings namely; James Magige Nyasendi and Agnes Boke Nyasendi. A grant was thereafter issued in Kehancha SRM’s Court Succession Cause No. 49 of 2012 on 28th January 2013 and confirmed on 9th September 2013.
By summons for revocation dated 18th July 2014, Alfayo Ragita Nyasendi, moved the Court to revoke the grant on grounds of material non-disclosure. He states that the petitioner did not disclose all the beneficiaries of the estate and the property subject of the estate was valued over Kshs. 100,000/= hence the court issuing the grant of representation lacked jurisdiction.
I have heard both sides and it is not in dispute that the deceased was married with two wives, ROBI NYASENDI and GATI NYASENDI. They all have children who are direct beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased. Section 51 of the Law of Succession Act (Chapter 160 of the Laws of Kenya) is clear that all the beneficiaries of the deceased must be named in the petition. Failure to name all of them constitutes material non-disclosure which entitles the court to set aside the grant of representation under the powers vested in it under section 76 of the Act.
The dispute between the parties, as I see it, is whether the deceased prior to his death had distributed part of his estate. This will be an issue to be dealt with at the confirmation stage.
In the circumstances, I make the following orders;
The grant of representation issued to John Marwa Nyasendi in Kehancha SRM’s Court Succession Cause No. 49 of 2012 on 28th January 2013 and confirmed on 9th September 2013 be and is hereby revoked. The respondent shall return the original certificates of grant to court for cancellation.
A fresh grant of representation for the estate of the deceased be and is hereby issued to JOHN MARWA NYASENDI and ALFAYO RAGITA NYASENDI.
The Administrators, or either of them shall apply for confirmation of the grant within 30 days
There shall be no order as to costs.
DATED and DELIVERED at MIGORI on this 8th day of September 2014
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Mudeyi instructed by Mudeyi Okumu and Company Advocates for the applicant.
Mr Kisera instructed by Omonde Kisera and Company Advocates for the respondent.