[2021] KEELC 1018 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1018 (KLR)

The court, upon perusal of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion, found sufficient grounds to grant the request to dispense with service in the first instance and to temporarily stay the hearing of the counter-claim. Consequently, the orders issued on 22nd September 2021 listing the case for further hearing were vacated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 1018 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Alfonse Wanjala Masinde; Defendant: Altalf Abdulali Shariff Jivraj; Defendant: Nazmudin Abdulali Shariff Jivraj; Defendant: The County Government of Bungoma; Defendant: The Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The Hon Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 23 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Application; Order on Notice of Motion for Stay and Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
interlocutory orders granted in part; prayers (a) and (b) allowed; hearing of counter-claim stayed pending determination of application; other prayers deferred
Legal Topics
Ex Parte Judgment, Counter Claims, Interlocutory Orders, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Ex Parte Judgment Counter Claims Interlocutory Orders Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfonse Wanjala Masinde

Plaintiff

Altalf Abdulali Shariff Jivraj

Defendant

Nazmudin Abdulali Shariff Jivraj

Defendant

The County Government of Bungoma

Defendant

The Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

The Hon Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Application; Order on Notice of Motion for Stay and Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should dispense with service of the application in the first instance.
  2. 2 Whether the hearing of the counter-claim should be temporarily stayed pending determination of the application.
  3. 3 Whether the ex parte judgment in respect of the counter-claim and partial proceedings of 22nd September 2021 should be set aside and the suit remitted for pre-trial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court, upon perusal of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion, found sufficient grounds to grant the request to dispense with service in the first instance and to temporarily stay the hearing of the counter-claim. Consequently, the orders issued on 22nd September 2021 listing the case for further hearing were vacated to allow for the determination of the application. The court directed that the application be served on the defendants, who would then have an opportunity to respond, and set timelines for the exchange of submissions. The court emphasized compliance with these timelines, failing which the stay would lapse and the defendants could proceed to set a new hearing date. The remaining...

Court Disposition

interlocutory orders granted in part; prayers (a) and (b) allowed; hearing of counter-claim stayed pending determination of application; other prayers deferred

Orders

  • Prayer (a) granted: Service of the application dispensed with in the first instance.
  • Prayer (b) granted: Hearing of the counter-claim temporarily stayed pending determination of the application.