[2009] KEHC 243 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and was not caused by him, but rather by the time taken to obtain certified proceedings from the court. The court emphasized that litigants should not be shut out from pursuing appeals where there is a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 243 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alfred Kizito Aput; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 26 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Criminal Conviction Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Kizito Aput
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by the applicant or by the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and was not caused by him, but rather by the time taken to obtain certified proceedings from the court. The court emphasized that litigants should not be shut out from pursuing appeals where there is a reasonable explanation for delay, especially in criminal matters where the right to appeal is fundamental. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the applicant to file his appeal out of time, finding that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the application.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file his appeal out of time.
- The appeal should be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Miscellaneous Criminal Application 26 of 2009
ALFRED KIZITO APUT...............................................APPLICANT
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
By his Notice of Motion dated 24th February 2009 the applicant herein is seeking leave to file his appeal out of time. Mr. Getanda, Counsel for the Applicant, submitted that the applicant was convicted in Kakamega Chief Magistrate Criminal Case No. 3365 of 2006. Judgement was delivered on 22nd February, 2008 and the applicant applied for certified proceedings on 25th February, 2008.
The proceedings were issued to the applicant on 5th December, 2008 and were quite bulky. By then time to file the appeal had lapsed. Counsel further submitted that the appeal is arguable and that the delay was not deliberate.
Mr. Karuri, learned State Counsel, opposed the application. He contended that the proceedings were issued to the applicant on 5th December, 2008 yet the current application was filed on 10th March, 2009. This delay cannot be attributed to the court but to the applicant. Learned State Counsel submitted that the delay was deliberate and the court should not indulge the applicant.
In his supporting affidavit, the applicant has exhibited a letter dated 25th February, 2008 by his counsel requesting for certified copies of the proceedings. He paid for the proceedings on 4th March, 2008. The applicant has not attached copies of the certified proceedings to enable the court verify the date when the proceedings were certified. He contends that he was given the proceedings on 5th December, 2008.
The applicant contends that the delay in filing the Appeal was caused by the court as it took some time to have the proceedings typed. Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code empowers the court to enlarge time for filing of Appeal. If the applicant was supplied with the proceedings on 5th December, 2008, then by then time to file an appeal had already lapsed. Still the applicant had to make an application to be allowed to file his appeal out of time.
I am satisfied that the delay herein is not inordinate and was not caused by the applicant. The courts should not shut out a litigant who believes that he was wrongly convicted. The applicant is granted leave to file his appeal out of time. The Appeal should be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 7th day of October, 2009.
SAID J. CHITEMBWE
J U D G E