Musyoka v Republic (Criminal Revision E012 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 5656 (KLR) (29 April 2026) (Ruling)
The applicant is released under Section 35(1) of the CPC because the remaining period of imprisonment is insufficient for probation supervision and the Probation Sentence Review Report recommends release.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5656 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alfred Musyoka; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E012 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Applicant released from imprisonment under Section 35(1) of the CPC.
- Legal Topics
- Mining Without a Licence, Sentencing, Probation, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Musyoka
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be released from imprisonment and placed on probation under Section 35(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is released under Section 35(1) of the CPC because the remaining period of imprisonment is insufficient for probation supervision and the Probation Sentence Review Report recommends release.
Court Disposition
Applicant released from imprisonment under Section 35(1) of the CPC.
Orders
- Applicant released on condition that he does not repeat the offence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Musyoka v Republic (Criminal Revision E012 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 5656 (KLR) (29 April 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 5656 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Voi Criminal Revision E012 of 2026 AN Ongeri, J April 29, 2026 Between Alfred Musyoka Applicant and Republic Respondent Ruling 1.The Applicant was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment for the offence of mining without a licence Contrary to Section 202(1) of the Mining Act. 2.He has served a substantial period of time since December 2025. 3.The Probation Sentence Review Report recommends that he be placed on probation. 4.However, the remaining period of 3 months is not sufficient for probation supervision. 5.The Applicant is released under Section 35(1) of the CPC on condition that he does not repeat the offence. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2026 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI HIGH COURT.ASENATH ONGERIJUDGEIn the presence of:-Court Assistant: Millicent/EghwaProsecutor: Ms. KanyuiraThe Applicant present