[2017] KEHC 3660 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3660 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was duly instructed by the respondent and that there was no dispute as to retainer. The certificate of taxation for Kshs. 1,238,841.36 had not been set aside or altered. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court held that under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3660 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alfred Ochieng Opiyo t/a Ochieng Opiyo & Company Advocates; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement Party
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 12 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Disputes, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Disputes Certificate of Taxation Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Ochieng Opiyo t/a Ochieng Opiyo & Company Advocates

Applicant

Orange Democratic Movement Party

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of costs issued by the court should be deemed as a decree and judgment for the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 30 days after service of the bill of costs.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was duly instructed by the respondent and that there was no dispute as to retainer. The certificate of taxation for Kshs. 1,238,841.36 had not been set aside or altered. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court held that under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and the cited case law, it had discretion to enter judgment on the certificate of taxation. Further, under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, the applicant was entitled to interest at 14% per annum from 30 days after service of the bill of costs. The court therefore entered judgment for the applicant for the taxed sum, interest as stipulated, and costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 1,238,841.36.
  • Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 1.4.17 until payment in full.