[2012] KEHC 5878 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence of 12 years imprisonment for manslaughter was neither harsh nor excessive given the brutality of the offence, where the appellant killed a 14-year-old relative by inflicting severe injuries. The court considered the appellant's mitigation, including his status as a first offender...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5878 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Alfred Ouru Okuku; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 50 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Appeal Against Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Ouru Okuku
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 12 years imprisonment for manslaughter was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellant's mitigation as a first offender and family circumstances warranted reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence of 12 years imprisonment for manslaughter was neither harsh nor excessive given the brutality of the offence, where the appellant killed a 14-year-old relative by inflicting severe injuries. The court considered the appellant's mitigation, including his status as a first offender and family circumstances, but held that these did not outweigh the seriousness of the crime. The trial court's sentence was deemed appropriate and proportionate to the offence, and the appeal against sentence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
- The appellant shall serve the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
Criminal Appeal 50 of 2011
ALFRED OURU OKUKU.......................................................................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC..........................................................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
(Being an appeal from the conviction and sentence of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Homa Bay,
Hon. C. A. S Mutai in Criminal Case No. 523 of 2010 dated 15th October, 2010)
The appellant, Alfred Ouru Okuku was charged with manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 Penal code. The particulars of the charge were that on 8th day of March 2010 at Oganda village in Homa Bay district within Nyanza Province unlawfully killed Samuel Okoth Ouma. He pleaded not guilty to the charge, was tried and convicted by the SRM’s court, Homa Bay. He was sentenced on 15th October 2010 to serve 12 years in prison.
The appellant has now appealed against sentence. In his undated petition filed on 16th March 2011, the appellant has prayed for leniency. He has stated that being a first offender the sentence imposed on him was harsh; that he was an orphan and a bread winner of his family and extended family. He has also prayed that the court considers his mitigation.
The appeal came before me for hearing on 18th July 2012. The appellant submitted that he agreed with the conviction and was only appealing against sentence. He asked the court to reduce his sentence so that he can go home and take care of his children. The state through learned counsel Mr. Mutai opposed the appeal. Mr. Mutai submitted that the offence attracts a life sentence under section 205 of the Penal Code. Counsel submitted that a sentence of 12 years was therefore lenient.
I have considered the record and the rival submissions. The appellant killed a relative, a boy aged 14 years whose only mistake was to have let his family’s goats stray onto the appellant’s shamba. The appellant was found to have brutally injured him by hitting him against a log and stepping on his chest. That indeed was brutal. It is said that the boy was an orphan. The appellant seems to have been a victim of unbridled rage.
In submissions before this court, the appellant has prayed for leniency and mercy. I have considered that. I have also considered that justice looks both ways. I hold that the sentence meted out by the trial court was neither harsh and excessive nor lenient. I uphold it.
Accordingly I dismiss the appeal. The appellant shall serve the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Judgment dated, signedand delivered at Kisiithis 27th day of September, 2012.
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Samwel Ombati::for appellant (present/absent)
.................................... :counsel for respondent (present/absent)
Edwin Mongare:court clerk
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE