[2019] KEELRC 1224 (KLR)
The court held that the applicants' attempt to re-litigate the issue of taxation was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, as the matter had already been determined between the same parties. The court further found that there was no basis to grant leave to file a reference out of time, as the issue had been...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1224 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ali Kulo Godana & 8 Others; Respondent: Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 166,167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173 & 174 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Decision on Taxation Reference
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- AN Makau
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Review of Decision, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Kulo Godana & 8 Others
Applicant
Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Decision on Taxation Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for review of the court's decision on taxation reference is properly before the court.
- 2 Whether the doctrine of res judicata bars the applicants from re-litigating the issue of taxation.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to file a reference out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicants' attempt to re-litigate the issue of taxation was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, as the matter had already been determined between the same parties. The court further found that there was no basis to grant leave to file a reference out of time, as the issue had been adequately litigated and the applicants were estopped from reopening the matter. The application was deemed an abuse of the court process and dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The application dated 14th January 2019 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CASE NO. 166 OF 2015
(As Consolidated with Cause No’s. 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173 &174 all of 2015)
ALI KULO GODANA &8 OTHERS...........CLAIMANTS/APPLICANTS
VERSUS
JIANGXI ZHONGMEI ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED.........................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Notice of Motion application before me is the Claimant/Applicant’s application dated 14th January 2019 and filed on 22nd January 2019 seeking a review of the court’s decision made on 13th December 2018 which rejected the Claimants/Applicants’ motion to have the matters referred back to the Taxing Master for re-taxation. The Applicants’ argue that it is not the court’s order of 18th January 2018 that was subject of the application of 13th December 2018 but the Deputy Registrar’s Ruling of 9th April 2018.
2. The motion is opposed and the Respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by Zhang Jiaxing a project administrator of the Respondent. He deposed that the motion before court was hopelessly out of time as a reference ought to have been filed within 14 days of the taxation.
3. The motion by the Claimants must fail. The attempt to re-litigate the already determined issue on the reference is res judicataand the decision of the court in relation to the impugned reference is final. Res Judicatais the Latin term for a matter already judged. In this context, res judicatarefers to the legal doctrine that seeks to bar or preclude continued litigation of a case on same issues between the same parties. There is no basis to grant the Claimants leave to file a reference out of time whichever way they try to slice it as this matter of taxation has been adequately litigated. There is estoppel against the Claimants from litigating the matter afresh. The present application is therefore an abuse of the court process and a total waste of judicial time and only fit for dismissal with costs to the Respondent. Application dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 3rd day of July 2019
Nzioki wa Makau
JUDGE
I certify that this is a
true copy of the Original
Deputy Registrar