[2001] KECA 237 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 237 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the applicants admitted owing the debt to the respondent and had made no payment or arrangements to pay. The only issue raised was the alleged lack of evidence of posting the statutory notice, which the High Court had already found was posted. The appellate court determined that this...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 237 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ali Mahmud Sheikh Mohamed; Applicant: Salem Sheikh Omar; Applicant: Jamal Mahmud Sheikh Mohamed; Respondent: Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 403 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Application for Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Injunction Pending Appeal, Statutory Notice Requirements, Debt Recovery
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Injunction Pending Appeal Statutory Notice Requirements Debt Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Mahmud Sheikh Mohamed

Applicant

Salem Sheikh Omar

Applicant

Jamal Mahmud Sheikh Mohamed

Applicant

Kenya Commercial Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Application for Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated an arguable appeal to warrant the grant of an injunction pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of evidence of posting the statutory notice invalidates the respondent's right to recover the debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the applicants admitted owing the debt to the respondent and had made no payment or arrangements to pay. The only issue raised was the alleged lack of evidence of posting the statutory notice, which the High Court had already found was posted. The appellate court determined that this did not constitute an arguable point for the intended appeal. Consequently, the threshold for granting an injunction pending appeal was not met, as there was no merit in the application. The motion was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for injunction pending appeal is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.