[2019] KEHC 4458 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4458 (KLR)

The court found that, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the Petitioner was unconstitutional. The court considered the circumstances of the offence, noting that although the Petitioner threatened violence during the robbery, no one was harmed....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4458 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Ali Mlako Mwero; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 49 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Outcome
petition_allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Death Penalty, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Death Penalty Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Mlako Mwero

Appellant

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the Petitioner for robbery with violence is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to resentencing and, if so, what sentence is appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence previously imposed on the Petitioner was unconstitutional. The court considered the circumstances of the offence, noting that although the Petitioner threatened violence during the robbery, no one was harmed. The Petitioner had already served 20 years in prison, which the court deemed sufficient for retribution, rehabilitation, and reform. Consequently, the court resentenced the Petitioner to 20 years' imprisonment, effectively ordering his immediate release as he had already served the full term.

Court Disposition

petition_allowed

Orders

  • The Petitioner is resentenced to 20 years in jail.
  • Having served the entire sentence, the Petitioner is to be forthwith set free and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.