[2024] KEHC 7306 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revisit or alter a sentence that has already been upheld by another judge of the High Court, as both are courts of equal jurisdiction. The applicant's request to have the period spent in custody considered and to substitute his custodial sentence with a non-custodial one cannot...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 7306 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdulaziz Loyara Ali; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Time Spent in Custody and Sentence Substitution
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Jurisdiction of High Court, Credit for Time Served, Sexual Offences, Appeal Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdulaziz Loyara Ali
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Time Spent in Custody and Sentence Substitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revisit and alter a sentence previously upheld by a court of equal jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody considered in his sentence.
- 3 Whether the applicant's sentence can be substituted with a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revisit or alter a sentence that has already been upheld by another judge of the High Court, as both are courts of equal jurisdiction. The applicant's request to have the period spent in custody considered and to substitute his custodial sentence with a non-custodial one cannot be entertained at this level. The appropriate forum for such relief is the Court of Appeal. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction and lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and merit.
- File is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Ali v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 7306 (KLR) (4 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7306 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2024
REA Ougo, J
June 4, 2024
Between
Abdulaziz Loyara Ali
Applicant
and
Republic
Prosecution
Ruling
1. Abdulaziz Loyara Ali the applicant in this matter has filed an application seeking the following orders; that the court should consider the time spent in prison custody during trial as from the time of arrest.
2. In his supporting affidavit he avers that he was charged, tried and convicted, and sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment for the offence of Defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. He seeks that the court consider the period spent in prison and from the date of his arrest. That he has been rehabilitated and has attained good character. He also seeks that the sentence he is serving may be substituted with a non-custodial sentence.
3. The application was opposed by the Respondent. Miss Matere submitted as follows; they objected to the orders being sought. That the sentence meted for 20 years was well merited. The victim was 15 years and she was turned into a mother prematurely and the applicant continues to brag about his unlawful act. The applicant's action had a permanent impact on the victim and the family and such conduct must be curtailed by the law. That his appeal was heard in the High Court and during the appeal he shamelessly referred to the sexual action and said he had fathered a child with the minor. Lastly, they challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter as this court would be revisiting a decision made by a court of similar jurisdiction.
4. I have considered the application and the submissions by the applicant and respondent. The applicant was convicted and sentenced on 8. 5.2013. He appealed to the High Court and in a judgment dated 30. 3.2017 Justice Ali- Aroni, as she then, upheld the conviction and sentence merited by the law court.
5. This court is a court of equal jurisdiction as the court that heard the applicant’s appeal. I agree with the Respondent that I would be revisiting the decision of a court of equal jurisdiction. I lack the jurisdiction to do so. The applicant can pursue the orders sought in the Court of Appeal. I therefore find no merit in the application and I dismiss it. File is closed.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Bungoma this 4th day of June, 2024. R. E. OUGOJUDGEIn the presence of:Abdulaziz Loyara Ali Present in PersonMiss Matere - State Counsel ODDPWilkister/ Diana - C/AMISC CRIMINAL CASE NO. E008 OF 2024-RULING 0