[2017] KEELC 1677 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiffs had made unsuccessful and diligent efforts to personally serve the 3rd defendant, as evidenced by affidavits on record. The court further noted that the 3rd defendant's postal address was available from the sale agreement, making substituted service by registered post and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 1677 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alice C. Juma; Plaintiff: Elizabeth C. Mitei (suing as officials of Chamasis Women's Group); Defendant: Esther Chepkurui Magai; Defendant: Veronica Arap Sang; Defendant: Musa Bulhan
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 226 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Renewal of Summons, Substituted Service, and Amendment of Plaint
- Outcome
- Application allowed in its entirety.
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Renewal of Summons, Substituted Service, Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice C. Juma
Plaintiff
Elizabeth C. Mitei (suing as officials of Chamasis Women's Group)
Plaintiff
Esther Chepkurui Magai
Defendant
Veronica Arap Sang
Defendant
Musa Bulhan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Renewal of Summons, Substituted Service, and Amendment of Plaint
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should renew and extend the summons to enter appearance for the 3rd defendant.
- 2 Whether leave should be granted for substituted service of summons on the 3rd defendant by registered post and newspaper advertisement.
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to amend the plaint to include a new defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs had made unsuccessful and diligent efforts to personally serve the 3rd defendant, as evidenced by affidavits on record. The court further noted that the 3rd defendant's postal address was available from the sale agreement, making substituted service by registered post and newspaper advertisement appropriate. Additionally, the court found that the proposed 4th defendant was a signatory to the relevant sale agreement, justifying her joinder as a defendant. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to renew and extend the summons, grant leave for substituted service, and allow amendment of the plaint to include the new defendant, ensuring that all...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in its entirety.
Orders
- Summons to enter appearance for the 3rd defendant renewed and extended for twelve months from the date of the ruling.
- Leave granted to effect service of summons on the 3rd defendant by registered post through P.O. Box 15420 Nakuru.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAKURU
CASE No. 226 OF 2013
ALICE C. JUMA
ELIZABETH C. MITEI (suing as officials
of Chamasis Women's Group) …...................……..….………….PLAINTIFFS
VERSUS
ESTHER CHEPKURUI MAGAI ………………………..…..........1ST DEFENDANT
VERONICA ARAP SANG ……………………........…..............2ND DEFENDANT
MUSA BULHAN ………………….....................……...............3RD DEFENDANT
RULING
1. This ruling is in respect of plaintiffs' Notice of Motion dated 16th October 2014. The application is brought under Order 5 rules 1, 2, 17(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. The pertinent prayers sought in the application are:
1. Spent.
2. That this honourable court be pleased to reissue the summons to enter appearance to the 3rd defendant.
3. That this honourable court be pleased to grant leave to the plaintiffs/applicants to effect service of the summons to enter appearance upon 3rd defendant/respondent through registered post.
4. That leave be granted to the applicants to amend their plaint to include SUSAN TAPKOROI ARAP MAINA as defendant.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Kipkoech Bernhard Ng'etich who was the plaintiffs' advocate as at the date the application was filed. He deposes that summons in respect of the 3rd defendant which were issued on 19th March 2013 have never been served upon the said defendant since he has not been traced for purposes of personal service. As a result, the summons has since expired.
3. I have considered the application. Though served, the 1st and 2nd defendants neither filed a response to the application nor attended its hearing. In view of the affidavit of Hebron Odhiambo Omollo, it is clear that the plaintiffs had made unsuccessful efforts to personally serve the 3rd defendant with summons. I also note that the proposed 4th defendant was a signatory to the sale agreement dated 4th December 2008 and that in the said agreement the postal address of the 3rd defendant is captured as P. O Box 15420 Nakuru.
4. In the circumstances, I make the following orders:
a) Summons to enter appearance in respect of the 3rd defendant are hereby renewed and extended for a period of twelve months from the date of this ruling.
b) Leave is hereby granted to the plaintiffs to effect service of summons to enter appearance upon the 3rd defendant by registered post through the postal address P. O Box 15420 Nakuru.
c) Additionally, the plaintiffs to effect service of summons to enter appearance upon the 3rd defendant by way of an advertisement in a daily newspaper of national circulation.
d) Leave is hereby granted to the plaintiffs to amend the plaint to include SUSAN TAPKOROI ARAP MAINA as 4th defendant in terms of the draft amended plaint annexed to Notice of Motion dated 16th October 2014.
e) The service of summons and amendment to be effected within 21 days from the date of this ruling.
f) The 3rd defendant to enter appearance within 21 days from the date of whichever option of service that is last.
g) Costs in the cause.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 29th day of September 2017.
D. O. OHUNGO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Mwalo holding brief for Mr. Morintat for the plaintiffs/applicants
No appearance for the defendants/respondents
Court Assistant: Gichaba