[2013] KEHC 5709 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5709 (KLR)

The court found that the ODM party list annexed to the affidavit confirmed Tabitha Gakii was number two on the list, and the first nominee was a man. The IEBC acted in accordance with the list submitted by the party. Furthermore, the court held that Tabitha Gakii, whose nomination was challenged, was not joined as a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5709 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Chepkirui Kering; Respondent: The Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 318 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Party List Nomination, Right to Be Heard, Gender Top Up, Electoral Dispute
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party List Nomination Right to Be Heard Gender Top Up Electoral Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Chepkirui Kering

Applicant

The Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent erred in upholding the ODM list of nominees to Nakuru County Assembly.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner was unlawfully excluded from the gender top up list.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of Tabitha Gakii as a party to the proceedings affects the validity of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ODM party list annexed to the affidavit confirmed Tabitha Gakii was number two on the list, and the first nominee was a man. The IEBC acted in accordance with the list submitted by the party. Furthermore, the court held that Tabitha Gakii, whose nomination was challenged, was not joined as a party to the proceedings, and any adverse decision against her would violate her right to be heard. Therefore, the petition lacked merit both on substance and on procedural fairness grounds.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.