https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10043

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10043

The court found that although the applicant had made positive rehabilitative progress and had served about thirteen years, those factors alone did not justify interference with a lawful and proportionate 25-year sentence for robbery with violence; there was therefore no basis to reduce or convert the sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 10043 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: ALICE HALIMA SHIBISHI; Respondent: REPUBLIC
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E059 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision Application / Sentence Review After Conviction, Appeal, and Prior Sentence Substitution
Outcome
Application dismissed
Judges
["DR Kavedza"]
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Sentence Review, Rehabilitation, Probation Report, Custodial Sentence Reduction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision Robbery With Violence Sentence Review Rehabilitation Probation Report Custodial Sentence Reduction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ALICE HALIMA SHIBISHI

Applicant

REPUBLIC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision Application / Sentence Review After Conviction, Appeal, and Prior Sentence Substitution

  1. 1 Whether the court should review and reduce a lawful custodial sentence for robbery with violence on the basis of rehabilitation, remorse, and time served.
  2. 2 Whether the favourable probation and aftercare report justifies conversion of the remaining custodial term to a non-custodial sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the applicant had made positive rehabilitative progress and had served about thirteen years, those factors alone did not justify interference with a lawful and proportionate 25-year sentence for robbery with violence; there was therefore no basis to reduce or convert the sentence.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence remains twenty-five (25) years' imprisonment.
  • The applicant shall continue serving the sentence to lawful completion.