[2017] KEELC 2494 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2494 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants were not parties to the original suit and had not filed an appeal or an application for review of the judgment. The legal framework only allows for a stay of execution pending appeal or review, neither of which was present. The applicants' claim was not connected to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2494 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Alice Jepkoech Yano; Plaintiff: Joseph Kipchumba Yano; Plaintiff: Joyce Chepkoech Siror; Defendant: Samson Kiprop; Defendant: Wilson Kipng’etich; Defendant: Benjamin Langat; Defendant: Hillary Kipkemboi Rono; Defendant: Philip Kiprotich Serem; Defendant: George Lelei Kipkemboi; Defendant: Wilson Kiplagat; Applicant: Salim Seif Ambunya Andanje (on behalf of 23 others)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 608 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Eviction Orders, Locus Standi, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Eviction Orders Locus Standi Joinder of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Jepkoech Yano

Plaintiff

Joseph Kipchumba Yano

Plaintiff

Joyce Chepkoech Siror

Plaintiff

Samson Kiprop

Defendant

Wilson Kipng’etich

Defendant

Benjamin Langat

Defendant

Hillary Kipkemboi Rono

Defendant

Philip Kiprotich Serem

Defendant

George Lelei Kipkemboi

Defendant

Wilson Kiplagat

Defendant

Salim Seif Ambunya Andanje (on behalf of 23 others)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to a stay of execution of the eviction orders issued by the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants, not being parties to the original suit, have locus standi to seek stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay is properly before the court in the absence of an appeal or review.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants were not parties to the original suit and had not filed an appeal or an application for review of the judgment. The legal framework only allows for a stay of execution pending appeal or review, neither of which was present. The applicants' claim was not connected to the defendants' claim, and their proper recourse would have been to file a separate suit. Consequently, the application for stay of execution was dismissed for lack of legal basis and locus standi.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs.