[2016] KEHC 4866 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4866 (KLR)

The court found that the consent order entered into by the parties and adopted as an order of the court on 27/02/2013 was binding and enforceable. The court noted that the relevant government officers had indicated their readiness to implement the order, and there was no opposition from any party. Accordingly, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 4866 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice M. Nyaga; Respondent: County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Respondent: Phineas Njage Ndubi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 11 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Implementation of Consent Order
Outcome
application for implementation of consent order granted
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Access to Land, Consent Orders, Execution of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Access to Land Consent Orders Execution of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice M. Nyaga

Applicant

County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

Phineas Njage Ndubi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Implementation of Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether the consent order regarding the creation of a road of access should be implemented as agreed by the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the relevant government officers should be mandated to execute the necessary documents and actions for the creation of the road of access.
  3. 3 Whether security should be provided during the implementation of the court orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent order entered into by the parties and adopted as an order of the court on 27/02/2013 was binding and enforceable. The court noted that the relevant government officers had indicated their readiness to implement the order, and there was no opposition from any party. Accordingly, the court directed that the consent order be implemented forthwith, mandated the concerned officers to carry out the creation of the road of access, and ordered the provision of security during implementation. The court further directed that a report on the implementation be filed and that parties or their advocates could witness the process. The court's decision was grounded in the...

Court Disposition

application for implementation of consent order granted

Orders

  • The consent adopted as an order of the court is to be implemented forthwith.
  • The concerned government officers are to implement the orders on 27/04/2016 and file a report by 03/05/2016.