[2015] KEELRC 811 (KLR)
The court found that the claim was filed outside the statutory limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the cause of action accrued at the latest on 14 September 2011 and the claim was filed on 13 October 2014, more than three years later. The court held that it has no jurisdiction...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 811 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alice Moraa Kosgei & Geoffrey Ongechi (suing for the estate of Daphine Chebet Kosgei (Deceased)); Respondent: Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 508 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Reinstatement Application / Ruling on Motion to Reinstate Dismissed Cause
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Summary Dismissal, Reinstatement of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Moraa Kosgei & Geoffrey Ongechi (suing for the estate of Daphine Chebet Kosgei (Deceased))
Applicant
Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Reinstatement Application / Ruling on Motion to Reinstate Dismissed Cause
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cause was filed within the statutory limitation period under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the court should reinstate a suit dismissed for non-attendance where the delay is attributed to the advocate's mistake.
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing claims that are statute barred.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claim was filed outside the statutory limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the cause of action accrued at the latest on 14 September 2011 and the claim was filed on 13 October 2014, more than three years later. The court held that it has no jurisdiction to extend time or grant leave to file claims that are statute barred. Although the court acknowledged that the mistake leading to dismissal was that of the advocate and not the claimants, and would have considered reinstatement on that basis, the limitation issue was dispositive. The application for reinstatement was therefore dismissed as the court lacked jurisdiction to...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The motion dated 23 March 2015 for reinstatement is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 508 OF 2014
ALICE MORAA KOSGEI &
GEOFFREY ONGECHI (suing for the estate of
Daphine Chebet Kosgei (Deceased).............................CLAIMANT
v
MOI TEACHING & REFERRAL HOSPITAL..................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Claimants filed this cause against the Respondent on 13 October 2014 and Notice of Summons with a return date of 21 November 2014 was issued the next day.
2. The Federation of Kenya Employers filed a Memorandum of Appearance on behalf of the Respondent on 20 November 2014.
3. When the Cause was called out on 21 November 2014, the Claimants were not present neither were they represented.
4. The Court directed the Deputy Registrar to issue a notice to show cause to the parties and directed that the Cause be mentioned on 5 December 2014.
5. According to the record, the Deputy Registrar issued a notice dated 24 November 2014 addressed to C.D. Nyamweya & Co. Advocates and Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital.
6. On 5 December 2014, none of the parties were in attendance/represented and the Court dismissed the Cause.
7. About some 5 months later, on 30 April 2015 to be exact, the Claimants filed a motion seeking the reinstatement of the Cause. The Court directed that the application be served for inter partes hearing on 16 June 2015.
8. Among the grounds outlined on the face of the motion were that the hearing date was not communicated to the parties; that the mistake that led to the dismissal was that of the Advocate and not the Claimant and that the Claimants had a good case.
9. The supporting affidavit of C.D. Nyamweya Advocate deposed that the Advocate he had briefed to hold his brief on 21 November 2014, a Mr. Mbati had informed him that the Cause was not listed on that day, and therefore he was not aware of the mention fixed for 5 December 2014. The Advocate also denied receiving the notice from the Deputy Registrar.
10. The Respondent left the matter to the Court.
11. The cause of action herein, according to the pleading arose from the summary dismissal of the deceased on 2 June 2010. The deceased appealed the dismissal and the appeal was dismissed on 14 September 2011.
12. Taking the date of the communication of the dismissal of the appeal as the date the cause of action accrued (latest), the Claim should have, by dint of section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 been commenced by 13 September 2014.
13. The Claim was commenced on 13 October 2014 outside the limitation period. In this regard, the contention by the Claimants that they have a good case to ventilate is untenable.
14. The Court reaches this conclusion purely based on the facts as set out in the Memorandum of Claim and it is conscious that the parties did not directly address the issue of limitation.
15. The Claimants also contended that the mistake that led to the dismissal was that of their Advocate and the same should not be visited upon them. It is good the Claimants have admitted that they confirmed from the file that the matter was called out when it was dismissed.
16. On this basis, the Court would have been minded to reinstate the Cause but because of the limitation issue, the Cause will not go any further as in any case, the Court has no jurisdiction to grant leave/extend time to file claims which are statute barred. Prudent use of judicial time dictates against allowing the motion.
17. In the event, the Court dismisses the motion dated 23 March 2015 with no order as to costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 26th day of June 2015.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Magatta instructed by C.D. Nyamweya & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Mr. Masese, Senior Legal Officer, Federation of Kenya Employers
Court Assistant Nixon