[2013] KEHC 6189 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6189 (KLR)

The court held that the dispute raised by the petitioner concerns her political party's decision not to forward her name for nomination, which is a matter squarely within the jurisdiction of the Political Parties Tribunal under the Political Parties Act. The High Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to entertain the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6189 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Moraa Koskei; Respondent: National Alliance Party; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Anne Khesabo Gati
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 311 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Political Party Membership, Nomination Disputes, Jurisdiction of Tribunals
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Political Party Membership Nomination Disputes Jurisdiction of Tribunals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Moraa Koskei

Applicant

National Alliance Party

Respondent

Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Anne Khesabo Gati

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 3rd respondent was validly nominated to the Kisii County Assembly as a TNA nominee.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to political party membership and nominations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the dispute raised by the petitioner concerns her political party's decision not to forward her name for nomination, which is a matter squarely within the jurisdiction of the Political Parties Tribunal under the Political Parties Act. The High Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The 2nd respondent acted lawfully in dismissing the petitioner's complaint, and the petition was accordingly dismissed.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.