[2019] KEHC 2621 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2621 (KLR)

The court found that the advocate was duly retained by the client and acted in Kisumu CA No. 22 of 2018, for which costs were taxed. There was no dispute as to retainer, and the certificate of taxation had not been set aside or altered. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, judgment could be entered on the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2621 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Nyomenda Oeri t/a A.N. Oeri & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Silvanus Osoro Onyiego
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 55 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Client Costs Certificate of Taxation Judgment Entry Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Nyomenda Oeri t/a A.N. Oeri & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Silvanus Osoro Onyiego

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the advocate against the client based on a certificate of taxation that has not been set aside or altered.
  2. 2 Whether interest on the taxed costs is payable and from which date.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the advocate was duly retained by the client and acted in Kisumu CA No. 22 of 2018, for which costs were taxed. There was no dispute as to retainer, and the certificate of taxation had not been set aside or altered. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, judgment could be entered on the certificate. The court also found that interest at 14% per annum was payable from one month after the bill was served, as provided by Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order. Since the bill was served on 9th May 2019, interest was to accrue from 9th June 2019. The application was unopposed, and the advocate was entitled to judgment as sought, including interest and costs of the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 4,058,501.80.
  • Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 9th June, 2019 until payment in full.