[2019] KEHC 502 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant/client was properly served with the bill of costs and notice of taxation, as evidenced by the process server's affidavit and the applicant's failure to specifically deny being present at the stated location and time. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant's denial of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 502 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Alice Nyomenda Oeri t/a A.N.Oeri & Co. Advocates; Applicant: Silvanus Osoro Onyiego
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 55 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the advocate
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Service of Process, Retainer Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Nyomenda Oeri t/a A.N.Oeri & Co. Advocates
Respondent
Silvanus Osoro Onyiego
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant/client was properly served with the bill of costs and notice of taxation.
- 2 Whether the advocate was retained by the applicant/client in the relevant election petition appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant/client was properly served with the bill of costs and notice of taxation, as evidenced by the process server's affidavit and the applicant's failure to specifically deny being present at the stated location and time. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant's denial of retainer was unsubstantiated and contradicted by the judgments in the election petition appeal, which recognized the advocate's representation. The court concluded that the application was without merit and was an attempt to deny the advocate the fruits of her judgment.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the advocate
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 26th November, 2019 and filed on 27th November, 2019 is disallowed.
- Costs awarded to the advocate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
MISC. APPLICATION NO 55 of 2019
BETWEEN
ALICE NYOMENDA OERI t/a A.N.Oeri & Co. Advocates..........................ADVOCATE AND
SILVANUS OSORO ONYIEGO...............................................................APPLICANT/CLIENT
JUDGMENT
1. By a notice of motion dated 26th November, 2019 and filed on 27th November, 2019, brought under Section 1A, 1B, 3A and 27 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Article 159 of the Constitution, the Applicant/client prays for orders:
1) THAT the Honourable Court be pleased to vary, quash or set aside the certificate of Taxation herein
2) Costs be awarded to the Applicant/client
2. The motion is premised on the grounds among others that the Applicant/Client did not retain the Advocate in Kisumu Election Petition Appeal No. 22 Of 2018 which is the subject of the Bill of Costs for which the Advocates has commenced execution and further that Applicant/Client was not served with the Bill of Costs.
3. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant on 26th November, 2019 in which he reiterates the grounds on the face of the application.
4. In her replying affidavit sworn on 03rd December, 2019 and filed on even date, the Advocate avers dwelt on the issue of her acting for the Applicant/Client and to her affidavit annexed the judgments in the Election Petition by the High Court and by the Court of Appeal. He clarified that the Mrs. Morara in both judgment is her marital name.
5. I have considered the application in the light of the light of the affidavits on record and annexures thereto.
6. The 1st issue for consideration is whether the Applicant/Client was Ndewa, a process server by his affidavit of service sworn on 24th May, 2019, averred that he served the Bill of Costs and notice of taxation on the Applicant/Client on 09th May, 2019 at around 04. 00 pm in the offices of Zablon Mokua & Company Advocates located at Popman House, 1st floor, Wing B, Suite No. 103 B where he was having a meeting but he declined to sign for them.
7. Other than state that he was not served, the Applicant/Client has not denied that on 09th May, 2019 at around 04. 00 pm, he was having a meeting in the offices of Zablon Mokua & Company Advocates located at Popman House, 1st floor, Wing B, Suite No. 103 B.
8. Consequently, I find that the Applicant/Client was properly served with the Bill of Costs and notice of taxation but ignored to attend the hearing of the taxation.
9. The second issue touches on retainer with the Applicant/Client stating that the Advocate was not one of the Advocates he retained in the Election Petition Appeal but failing to disclose those that he instructed. The judgment of court in that said Election Petition Appeal and it is imprudent for the Applicant/Client to deny the obvious.
10. From the foregoing, I find that the Applicant/Client denial that he did not retain the Advocate is an afterthought meant to deny the Advocate the fruits of her judgment which this court declines to yield to.
11. From the foregoing analysis, I have come to the conclusion that the notice of motion dated 26th November, 2019 and filed on 27th November, 2019 has no merit and the same is disallowed with costs to the Advocate.
DATED AND DELIVERED IN KISUMU THIS 19th DAY OF December2019
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Read in open court in the presence of-
Court Assistant - Amondi/Okodoi
For the Advocate Mr Gichoba
For the Client - N/A