[2016] KEELC 1070 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with a probability of success, as she provided documentary evidence of her late husband's purchase of the suit property, the Land Control Board's consent, and the confirmation of grant distributing the estate to her. The defendants failed to file...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 1070 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alice Wairimu Waweru; Defendant: Naomi Wambui Kuria; Defendant: Director of Adjudication; Defendant: Ministry of Lands Nairobi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 283 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application for injunction allowed.
- Judges
- MA Silau
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Ownership Disputes, Succession and Land Transfer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Wairimu Waweru
Plaintiff
Naomi Wambui Kuria
Defendant
Director of Adjudication
Defendant
Ministry of Lands Nairobi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff stands to suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favour of the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with a probability of success, as she provided documentary evidence of her late husband's purchase of the suit property, the Land Control Board's consent, and the confirmation of grant distributing the estate to her. The defendants failed to file any response or provide evidence supporting the 1st defendant's alleged purchase. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the defendants interfered with her possession of the land. Accordingly, the court granted the interlocutory injunction restraining the 1st defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's quiet possession of the property...
Court Disposition
Application for injunction allowed.
Orders
- The 1st defendant, either by herself, her servants, agents, or assigns, is restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's quiet possession of land parcel Nyandarua/Mawingo/665 until the final disposal of the suit.
- The plaintiff is awarded the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
ELC NO. 283 OF 2015
ALICE WAIRIMU WAWERU....................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
NAOMI WAMBUI KURIA
THE DIRECTOR OF ADJUDICATION............1ST DEFENDANT
MINISTRY OF LANDS NAIROBI..................2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
(Application for injunction; principles to be applied; plaintiff's late husband having purchased the suit property; succession filed and property distributed to the plaintiff; 1st defendant laying claim to the land stating that she also purchased the land from the original owner; no response filed to the application and no proof that 1st defendant also purchased the said land; prima facie case established; application allowed)
1. This suit was commenced by way of plaint filed on 13th October 2015. Together with the plaint, the plaintiff filed an application for injunction under certificate of urgency. I certified the application as urgent and directed it to be served and be heard inter partes on 2nd November 2015. The application was duly served but the defendants did not file any response to it. Mrs. Nancy Njoroge for the plaintiff has urged me to allow the application in light of the fact that the defendants have not filed any papers to oppose it.
2. I have considered the application which is for injunction. The principles upon which a court will assess an application for injunction were laid down in the case of Giella vs Cassman Brown (1973) EA 358. In the said case, it was stated that to succeed in an application for injunction, one needs to demonstrate a prima facie case and also show that he stands to suffer irreparable loss if the injunction is not allowed. If in doubt the court will decide the application on a balance of convenience.
3. In this matter, the plaintiff's case is that her late husband, Francis Ikenye Muiruri, on 3rd May 1985, purchased from one Kamau Mweha, the land parcel Nyandarua/Mawingo/665. Consent from the Land Control Board was obtained and the transfer forms executed. However, Mr. Muiruri died in the year 1987 before the transfer could be effected. A succession cause to his estate was filed and it was directed that the suit property be registered in the names of the plaintiff and one Henry Mwangi Ikenye (whom I presume to be her son), on their own behalf and in trust for 4 other children who were said to be minors.
4. Her quarrel is that in July 2015, the 1st defendant laid claim to the suit land, alleging that she had also purchased it from Kamau Mweha in the year 1998. It is the plaintiff's position that the 1st defendant has no right over this land. In this suit, the plaintiff wants the 1st defendant to be permanently injuncted, and for an order directing the 2nd defendant, the Director of Land Adjudication, to transfer the suit property to her.
5. As I mentioned earlier, the defendants have not filed any response to this application. I have considered the said application. I have seen a copy of the agreement between the plaintiff's deceased husband and Kamau Mweha. I have also seen a copy of the Letter of Consent from the Land Control Board sanctioning the sale. The certificate of Confirmation of Grant distributing the estate of the plaintiff's late husband to the plaintiff was annexed. The defendants have not tabled anything to show that the 1st plaintiff has any right over the suit land. That being the case, I am convinced that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success. She will no doubt suffer irreparably if the defendants were to interfere with her possession of the suit land.
6. In the premises, I do allow this application for injunction and do restrain the 1st defendant either by herself or her servants/agents and/or assigns from interfering with the plaintiff's quiet possession of the land parcel Nyandarua/Mawingo/665, until the final disposal of this suit.
7. The plaintiff will also have the costs of the application.
8. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 2nd February, 2016.
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURTAT NAKURU
In presence of : -
Ms. Nancy Njoroge for plaintiff/applicant
Defendant: absent
CA: Janet
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURTAT NAKURU