[2017] KEELC 2678 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2678 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs, as administrators of the estate of the late George Kimeria Ndung’u Gichuki, had established through uncontroverted evidence that the deceased was the registered proprietor of the suit property. The defendant, having been duly served, failed to defend the suit or challenge the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2678 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Alice Wangechi Gichuki; Plaintiff: James Jack Mwangi Gichuki; Defendant: George Maguti
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 189 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiffs
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Land Ownership, Title Registration, Eviction, Proprietary Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Ownership Title Registration Eviction Proprietary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Wangechi Gichuki

Plaintiff

James Jack Mwangi Gichuki

Plaintiff

George Maguti

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs, as administrators of the estate of the deceased, are entitled to possession of Land Reference Number 209/10921.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant unlawfully encroached and erected structures on the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to mandatory injunction and eviction orders against the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs, as administrators of the estate of the late George Kimeria Ndung’u Gichuki, had established through uncontroverted evidence that the deceased was the registered proprietor of the suit property. The defendant, having been duly served, failed to defend the suit or challenge the plaintiffs' title. The court held that the plaintiffs' proprietary rights were protected under Article 40 of the Constitution and Sections 24 and 25 of the Land Registration Act. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the plaintiffs were entitled to possession of the property, mandatory injunction, and eviction orders against the defendant and his agents. The court...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • The defendant, his agents, servants and/or tenants shall vacate and surrender Land Reference Number 209/10921 comprised in Grant Number 144199 within sixty (60) days from the date of service of the decree.
  • In default of the above, an eviction order shall issue to be enforced under the supervision of the Area Police Officer Commanding Police Division.