[2024] KECPT 1716 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1716 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that as at the date the garnishee order was served, the respondent's account with the garnishee bank held only Kshs. 6,285.12. The garnishee bank's status as a secured creditor entitled it to priority over other creditors, and there was no evidence to show that additional funds had been received...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1716 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Martin Onyango Aloka; Respondent: Amiair Sacco Society Limited; Respondent: Co-operative Bank Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E298/176 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Garnishee Application / Ruling on Application for Garnishee Order Absolute
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Garnishee Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Priority of Creditors
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Garnishee Orders Enforcement of Judgments Priority of Creditors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Onyango Aloka

Applicant

Amiair Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Co-operative Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Garnishee Application / Ruling on Application for Garnishee Order Absolute

  1. 1 Whether the garnishee order nisi should be made absolute against the garnishee bank.
  2. 2 Whether the garnishee bank held funds belonging to the respondent at the time of service of the order.
  3. 3 Whether the garnishee bank's status as a secured creditor affects its obligation under the garnishee order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that as at the date the garnishee order was served, the respondent's account with the garnishee bank held only Kshs. 6,285.12. The garnishee bank's status as a secured creditor entitled it to priority over other creditors, and there was no evidence to show that additional funds had been received or that the garnishee was in a position to pay the decree. The legal effect of a garnishee order nisi is to freeze the funds in the account as at the date of service, and if there are insufficient funds, the order cannot be made absolute. Consequently, the application to make the garnishee order absolute failed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 25/7/2024 for a garnishee order absolute is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.