[2021] KEELC 2972 (KLR)
The court found that the order for restoration of the 4th defendant to the suit property, Nairobi/Block 26/113, as previously granted and upheld by the Court of Appeal, remained in force and had not been set aside. The plaintiffs' application for injunctive relief was dismissed as it sought to undermine a subsisting...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 2972 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alton Homes Limited; Plaintiff: John Kangogo; Defendant: Davis Nathan Chelogoi; Defendant: John Nduati Njuguna; Defendant: Samuel Kugega Ndegwa; Defendant: Joshua Omandi Hallanda; Defendant: Commercial Bank of Africa Ltd; Third Party: Transnational Bank Ltd
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 371 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- The 4th defendant's application for restoration is allowed; the plaintiffs' application for injunctive relief is dismissed.
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Restoration of Possession, Eviction Orders, Interlocutory Injunctions, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alton Homes Limited
Plaintiff
John Kangogo
Plaintiff
Davis Nathan Chelogoi
Defendant
John Nduati Njuguna
Defendant
Samuel Kugega Ndegwa
Defendant
Joshua Omandi Hallanda
Defendant
Commercial Bank of Africa Ltd
Defendant
Transnational Bank Ltd
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th defendant is entitled to restoration to property Nairobi/Block 26/113 pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief restraining the 4th and 5th defendants and the third party from interfering with their occupation and chattels on the suit property.
- 3 Whether the previous orders of restoration granted by the court and upheld on appeal remain in force.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order for restoration of the 4th defendant to the suit property, Nairobi/Block 26/113, as previously granted and upheld by the Court of Appeal, remained in force and had not been set aside. The plaintiffs' application for injunctive relief was dismissed as it sought to undermine a subsisting court order. The court emphasized that parties must comply with existing orders, and the 4th defendant was entitled to restoration pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The court further ordered that the Officer Commanding Station (OCS) Kileleshwa Police Station assist in the restoration, and that the costs of the application be borne by the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
The 4th defendant's application for restoration is allowed; the plaintiffs' application for injunctive relief is dismissed.
Orders
- The Officer Commanding Kileleshwa Police Station shall assist in restoration of Joshua Omondi Hallanda to property title number Nairobi/Block 26/113.
- The costs of the 4th defendant's application shall be borne by the plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
62 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO. 371 OF 2019
ALTON HOMES LIMITED........................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
JOHN KANGOGO.......................................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
DAVIS NATHAN CHELOGOI.................................................1ST DEFENDANT
JOHN NDUATI NJUGUNA.......................................................2ND DEFENDANT
SAMUEL KUGEGA NDEGWA.................................................3RD DEFENDANT
JOSHUA OMANDI HALLANDA..............................................4TH DEFENDANT
COMMERCIAL BANK OF AFRICA LTD...............................5TH DEFENDANT
TRANSNATIONAL BANK LTD.....................................................THIRD PARTY
RULING
1. This is the Notice of Motion dated 12th October 2020 brought under order 22 rule 29, order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 1A, 1B, 3A, 38a and f, 51 and 63 (e), of the Civil Procedure Act and all other enabling provisions of the law.
2. It seeks orders:-
1. Spent.
2. The officer commanding Kileleshwa Police Station do assist in restoration of Joshua Omandi Hallonda to property title number Nairobi/Block 26/113.
3. The cost of this application be borne by the plaintiffs.
4. Any other order deemed expedient in the circumstances be granted.
3. The grounds are on the face of the application and are set out in paragraphs 1 to 8.
4. The application is supported by the affidavit of Joshua Omondi Hallonda, the 4th defendant/applicant sworn on the 12th October 2020.
5. The application is opposed. There is a replying affidavit sworn by John Kangogo, managing director of the 1st plaintiff and the 2nd plaintiff/respondent herein sworn on the 7th December 2020. Counsel representing the 1st, 2nd and 5th defendants stated that they were not opposing the application.
6. There is also the Notice of Motion dated 7th December 2020 brought under section 28 of the Land Registration Act No 3 of 2012, Section 1A, 1B, 3, 3A 63 (c) and (e)of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 of the Laws of Kenya, Order 40, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010.
7. It seeks orders:-
1. Spent.
2. This application be heard together with the 4th defendant’s Notice of Motion dated 12th October, 2020.
3. The 4th and 5th defendants and the third party by themselves or by their agents, servants or otherwise howsoever be restrained from entering upon property Nairobi Block 26/113, levying distress upon, attaching the 1st and 2nd plaintiff’s furniture and chattels, evicting the 1st plaintiff from and/or in manner whatsoever interfering with the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs’ occupation of property Nairobi Block 26/113, pending the hearing and determination of this suit de novo.
4. The 4th and 5th defendants and the Third Party by themselves or by their agents, servants or otherwise howsoever be restrained from advertising, offering for sale, leasing, mortgaging, charging, transferring or assigning and/or otherwise dealing with the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs’ furniture and chattels distressed from the premises on property Nairobi Block 26/113 pending the hearing and determination of this suit de novo.
5. Directions for the hearing of the suit de novo be given and the suit be fixed for hearing on a priority basis.
6. The costs of this Application be provided for.
8. The grounds are on the face of the application and are set out in paragraphs 1 to 8.
9. The application is supported by the affidavit of John Kangogo the Managing Director of the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs/applicants sworn on the 7th December 2020.
10. The application is opposed. There is a replying affidavit sworn by Joshua Omondi Hallonda the 4th defendant/respondent sworn on the 9th December 2020. There is also a replying affidavit sworn by Jackson Nyaga, legal counsel for the 5th defendant sworn on the 14th December 2020.
11. The two applications were canvassed by oral submissions on 28th January 2021.
12. I have gone through the court record on the 25th October 2019, the Honourable LJ L. Gacheru granted the following orders:-
“1. That leave be and is hereby granted to the proposed interested parties to be enjoined in this suit.
2. That the 1st proposed interested party’s occupation prior to the eviction carried out on the number Nairobi/Block 26/113 on the 1st March 2019 be restored pending the hearing and determination of this application.
3. That there be stay of execution of the judgments entered on the 23rd February 2018 and subsequent decree pending the hearing and determination of this application.
4. That costs of this application to be met by the second defendant.
5. That the 2nd defendant/respondent to meet the costs incurred by the plaintiff/respondents herein in the enforcement or execution of the reviewed judgment as he omitted to avail crucial evidence in court.
6. That the 1st interested party’s occupation prior to the eviction from the suit property, be restored pending the de novo hearing and determination of the main suit herein.”
13. The plaintiffs being dissatisfied with the said orders preferred an appeal. The Court of Appeal in its Judgment dated 9th October 2020 dismissed the Appeal. In essence order no 6, is still inforce. It reads:-
“That the interested party’s occupation prior to the eviction from the suit property, be restored pending the de novo hearing and determination of the main suit”.
14. The “Interested Party’ is the 4th defendant/applicant herein. The said order has not be set aside. I therefore find merit in this application and the same is allowed.
15. Accordingly, I find the notice of motion dated 7th December 2020 to be devoid of merit. It is an abuse of the court process and the same is dismissed with costs to the 4th defendant/respondent.
16. The notice of motion dated 12th October 2020 is therefore allowed in the following terms: -
(a) That the OCS Kileleshwa Police Station do assist in restoration of Joshua Omondi Hollanda to property title Number Nairobi/Block 26/113.
(b) That the costs of this application be borne by the Plaintiffs.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN NAIROBI ON THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2021.
.................................
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ms E Angawa for N. Havi for the Plaintiffs
Mr. Ombwayo for the 1st Defendant
No appearance for the 2nd and 3rd Defendants
Mr. Odhiambo for the 4th Defendant
Ms Fiona Maina for the 5th Defendant
Mr. Ngaiywa for Kibet for the Third Party
Phyllis - Court Assistant