[2013] KESC 18 (KLR)

[2013] KESC 18 (KLR)

The Supreme Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction at this stage to entertain the petition concerning the conduct of Presidential elections by the IEBC. The Court found that, based on the Constitution and the Supreme Court Rules, its jurisdiction in Presidential election matters is specific and limited, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KESC 18 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Isaac Aluoch Polo Aluochier; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and 19 Others
Court
Supreme Court
Court Station
Supreme Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 2 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Presidential Election Petition / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
Petition dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Judges
MK Ibrahim, JB Ojwang
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Presidential Election Disputes
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Presidential Election Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Aluoch Polo Aluochier

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and 19 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Presidential Election Petition / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction at this stage to entertain the petition regarding the conduct of Presidential elections by the IEBC?
  2. 2 What is the scope of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction in relation to Presidential election matters under the Constitution and Supreme Court Rules?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction at this stage to entertain the petition concerning the conduct of Presidential elections by the IEBC. The Court found that, based on the Constitution and the Supreme Court Rules, its jurisdiction in Presidential election matters is specific and limited, and the present petition did not fall within the scope of matters the Court is empowered to hear at this point. The Court therefore declined to hear the petition and reserved its detailed reasons for a later date.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The Supreme Court declines to hear the petition for lack of jurisdiction at this stage.
  • No order as to costs.