[2016] KEHC 8395 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 8395 (KLR)

The court found that the notice of appointment filed by Okemwa & Co. Advocates and the consent filed on 25th July 2016 were not authorized by the applicant and were, in fact, denounced as forgeries by a family member and by the law firm purported to have signed them. The absence of any response from the implicated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 8395 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alvin Kamande Njenga; Respondent: Esther Njeri Njenga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2777 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Expunge Notice of Appointment and Consent
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
AO Muchelule
Legal Topics
Probate and Administration, Fraudulent Legal Representation, Consent Orders, Estate Disputes
Source Language
en
Family and Children Probate and Administration Fraudulent Legal Representation Consent Orders Estate Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alvin Kamande Njenga

Applicant

Esther Njeri Njenga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Expunge Notice of Appointment and Consent

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appointment filed by Okemwa & Co. Advocates was valid and authorized by the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the consent filed on 25th July 2016 was genuine or a forgery.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the impugned documents expunged from the court record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the notice of appointment filed by Okemwa & Co. Advocates and the consent filed on 25th July 2016 were not authorized by the applicant and were, in fact, denounced as forgeries by a family member and by the law firm purported to have signed them. The absence of any response from the implicated law firms further supported the applicant's case. The court held that documents filed without proper authority or through fraudulent means cannot be allowed to stand, as they compromise the integrity of the judicial process and the rights of the parties. Accordingly, the court expunged the impugned documents from the record and allowed the applicant's application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The notice of appointment filed by Okemwa & Co. Advocates on 25th July 2016 is expunged from the record.
  • The certificate of urgency dated and filed on 25th July 2016, including the consent, is expunged from the record.