[2020] KEELC 438 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 438 (KLR)

The court found that the issues concerning parcel Mwimbi/Murugi/1715 had been conclusively determined in previous litigation, including Meru Civil Appeal No. 106 of 1979, Meru High Court Civil Suit No. 204 of 2001, and the present court's judgment delivered on 21st March 2018. There was no appeal against the 2018...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 438 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Alvin Mbae; Plaintiff: Alice Mbiro (thro'Alvin Mbae as next friend); Plaintiff: Wilson Mbaabu; Defendant: Kinyua Mukatha; Defendant: Monica K. Mugo; Defendant: Anderson Nkonge Mugo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 258 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Outcome
Application allowed in part; substantive enforcement orders granted.
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Eviction Orders, Vacant Possession, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Execution of Judgment Eviction Orders Vacant Possession Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alvin Mbae

Plaintiff

Alice Mbiro (thro'Alvin Mbae as next friend)

Plaintiff

Wilson Mbaabu

Plaintiff

Kinyua Mukatha

Defendant

Monica K. Mugo

Defendant

Anderson Nkonge Mugo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to orders for execution of judgment including eviction and vacant possession of parcel Mwimbi/Murugi/1715.
  2. 2 Whether the court should allow substitution of the deceased 1st defendant with his legal representative for purposes of execution.
  3. 3 Whether inhibition orders and cautions on the suit property should be vacated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues concerning parcel Mwimbi/Murugi/1715 had been conclusively determined in previous litigation, including Meru Civil Appeal No. 106 of 1979, Meru High Court Civil Suit No. 204 of 2001, and the present court's judgment delivered on 21st March 2018. There was no appeal against the 2018 judgment. The court emphasized that litigation must come to an end and that its orders must be enforced. The continued occupation of the suit property by the plaintiffs was deemed illegal, and the court held that the applicants were entitled to enjoy the fruits of their judgment. The court therefore granted the substantive prayers sought for execution, including substitution of...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; substantive enforcement orders granted.

Orders

  • Prayers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the application are granted.
  • Leave granted for substitution of the deceased 1st defendant with his legal representative for execution purposes.