[2018] KEELC 3771 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3771 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, having entered into a recognition agreement with the claimant, was obligated to negotiate a collective bargaining agreement in good faith. The respondent's failure to make counter proposals, attend conciliation meetings, or participate in the proceedings constituted bad faith and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3771 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers; Respondent: M/S Load Trailer (EA) Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1340 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Union's CBA proposals largely adopted with modifications as per judgment.
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreement, Recognition Agreement, Wage Increments, Employment Terms, Trade Union Rights
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreement Recognition Agreement Wage Increments Employment Terms Trade Union Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers

Applicant

M/S Load Trailer (EA) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent acted in bad faith by refusing to negotiate a collective bargaining agreement with the claimant union.
  2. 2 Whether the court should adopt the union's proposals for the CBA in the absence of counter proposals from the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, having entered into a recognition agreement with the claimant, was obligated to negotiate a collective bargaining agreement in good faith. The respondent's failure to make counter proposals, attend conciliation meetings, or participate in the proceedings constituted bad faith and a breach of statutory duty under the Labour Relations Act. In the absence of any response or participation from the respondent, and guided by the economic report from the Central Planning and Monitoring Unit (CPMU), the court adopted the union's proposals for the CBA, subject to statutory minimums and economic realities as reflected in the cost of living indices and wage...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Union's CBA proposals largely adopted with modifications as per judgment.

Orders

  • The union's proposals for the CBA are adopted with specified modifications and statutory compliance.
  • The CBA is effective from 1st January 2018 for 24 months and continues until amended by a subsequent CBA.