[2025] KEBPRT 310 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to establish the existence of a valid tenancy relationship with either the Landlord or the Respondents. The only recognized tenant under the lease was the 2nd Respondent, and the lease expressly prohibited subletting without the Landlord's consent, which was neither sought nor obtained. The Applicant's evidence of rent payment was insufficient, as the beneficiary of the payment was not a party to the proceedings and no nexus was established. In the absence of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain the reference or grant the reliefs sought. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Applicant's reference and...
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 310 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Amara BB Limited; Respondent: Laser Properties Services; Respondent: Nadco Solutions Limited; Respondent: Local Authorities Pension Trust Registered Trustees
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E199 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Applications for Injunction and Joinder
- Outcome
- Application and reference dismissed for want of jurisdiction; interlocutory orders discharged; costs to the Applicant.
- Judges
- CN Mugambi
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Landlord Tenant Relationship, Controlled Tenancy, Subletting Without Consent, Eviction Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amara BB Limited
Applicant
Laser Properties Services
Respondent
Nadco Solutions Limited
Respondent
Local Authorities Pension Trust Registered Trustees
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Applications for Injunction and Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the reference in the absence of a landlord-tenant relationship between the Applicant and the Landlord or Respondents.
- 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to injunctive reliefs restraining eviction or interference with occupation of the premises.
- 3 Whether the Landlord is entitled to have the Tribunal's previous orders set aside and to recover rent arrears.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to establish the existence of a valid tenancy relationship with either the Landlord or the Respondents. The only recognized tenant under the lease was the 2nd Respondent, and the lease expressly prohibited subletting without the Landlord's consent, which was neither sought nor obtained. The Applicant's evidence of rent payment was insufficient, as the beneficiary of the payment was not a party to the proceedings and no nexus was established. In the absence of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain the reference or grant the reliefs sought. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Applicant's reference and...
Court Disposition
Application and reference dismissed for want of jurisdiction; interlocutory orders discharged; costs to the Applicant.
Orders
- The Reference by the Applicant and the Application filed therewith are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Any interlocutory orders issued hereinbefore are discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment