[2023] KEHC 23783 (KLR)
The court found that the trial and appellate records did not indicate that the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing was considered, as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that this period ought to have been factored into the sentence. Consequently, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 23783 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Obare Amara; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E020 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision Application
- Outcome
- application allowed; sentence revised
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Revision, Defilement Offence, Custodial Period Credit, Sexual Offences Act, Criminal Procedure, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Obare Amara
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody prior to sentencing considered in the computation of his sentence.
- 2 Whether the trial and appellate courts erred by not factoring in the pre-sentence custodial period as required by law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial and appellate records did not indicate that the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing was considered, as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that this period ought to have been factored into the sentence. Consequently, the court revised the sentence to order that the applicant's 20-year imprisonment term should run from the date he was first arraigned in court, thereby accounting for the pre-sentence custodial period.
Court Disposition
application allowed; sentence revised
Orders
- The applicant's sentence of 20 years imprisonment shall run from 9-6-2015, the date of first arraignment.
- The sentence as ordered by the trial court and confirmed on appeal is otherwise upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Amara v Republic (Criminal Petition E020 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 23783 (KLR) (18 October 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 23783 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Petition E020 of 2023
DO Ogembo, J
October 18, 2023
Between
Peter Obare Amara
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. In an undated application filed in court on 11-5-2023, the applicant Peter Obare Amara seeks that this court do revise his sentence to account for the period he spent in custody while awaiting the determination of his trial. He has submitted that he was charged, convicted and sentence to serve 20 years imprisonment. That he appealed to the High Court vide Criminal Appeal No. 115 of 2016 which appeal was dismissed.In a short response, the learned Prosecutor urged the court to dismiss the application of the applicant in view of the fact that his appeal was already dismissed by the High Court. I have considered this application of the applicant. I have also considered the record of proceedings both of the trial court and on appeal before this court. I have also considered the sentence provided for the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(1)(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006, under which the applicant was charged. The said Section provides for a sentence of not less than 20 years imprisonment.
2. In our instant case, the trial court, on 15-9-2016, sentenced the applicant to serve 20 years imprisonment. The High Court, it its Judgment delivered on 19/2/2018, affirmed the conviction and sentence.The proceedings both before the trial court and the High Court do not indicate whether period the applicant served in custody awaiting the determination of his trial was accounted for in the sentence. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code declares that such period spent in custody while awaiting determination of the trial ought to be considered in the sentence. The applicant was in custody as he underwent his trial. This period ought to have been factored in his sentence.
3. It is for this reason that I find merit in the application of the applicant. I allow the same. I accordingly therefore revise the sentence of the applicant herein and order that the applicant shall serve a term of 20 years imprisonment as ordered by the trial court and confirmed on appeal. The sentence of the applicant shall run from 9-6-2015, the date the applicant was first arraigned before the court. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023D.O. OGEMBOJUDGE10. 2023Court:Ruling read in court in the presence of the Applicant (Naivasha) and Ms. Mumu for the State.D.O. OGEMBOJUDGE10. 2023