[2023] KECA 1110 (KLR)
The court found that, based on the applicant's averments and supporting documents, there may have been an administrative lapse in the processing of his appeal after the High Court dismissed his first appeal. To resolve this, the court directed that the matter be placed before the Deputy Registrar for investigation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KECA 1110 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Ismail Ambunya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E288 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Hearing Date
- Outcome
- Application allowed to the extent of referring the matter to the Deputy Registrar for investigation and further action.
- Judges
- M Ngugi
- Legal Topics
- Appeals Process, Administrative Lapse, Court Registry Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Ismail Ambunya
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Hearing Date
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's appeal to the Court of Appeal was properly filed and processed after dismissal by the High Court.
- 2 Whether there was an administrative lapse in the Court Registry affecting the applicant's appeal.
- 3 What steps should be taken to facilitate the hearing of the applicant's appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, based on the applicant's averments and supporting documents, there may have been an administrative lapse in the processing of his appeal after the High Court dismissed his first appeal. To resolve this, the court directed that the matter be placed before the Deputy Registrar for investigation to establish the status of the appeal and to take appropriate action to facilitate the preparation of the record of appeal and the hearing of the applicant's appeal. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that appeals are processed and heard without undue delay, in line with constitutional guarantees of fair trial and access to justice.
Court Disposition
Application allowed to the extent of referring the matter to the Deputy Registrar for investigation and further action.
Orders
- This ruling to be placed before the Deputy Registrar of the Court for investigation into the status of the applicant's appeal after the High Court's dismissal on July 9, 2014.
- The Deputy Registrar to take appropriate action regarding preparation of the record of appeal to facilitate the hearing of the applicant's appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Ambunya v Republic (Criminal Application E288 of 2022) [2023] KECA 1110 (KLR) (22 September 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KECA 1110 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Criminal Application E288 of 2022
M Ngugi, JA
September 22, 2023
Between
Joseph Ismail Ambunya
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application seeking a hearing date for an appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega, (Dulu, J) dated 9th July, 2014 in HCCRA No. 54 of 2013)
Ruling
1. The applicant has filed an undated application by way of notice of motion in which he asks the court to give him a hearing date for his appeal. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant on November 10, 2022. He avers in this affidavit that he was charged with the offence of defilement contrary to section 296(2) (sic) of the Penal Code and sentenced to death. It would appear that this averment is made in error as section 296(2) provides for the offence of robbery with violence and prescribes death as the penalty therefor.
2. The applicant further avers that he appealed against his conviction and sentence but his first appeal was dismissed by Dulu, J. He avers that he filed a second appeal to this Court in 2014 but has not received a file number nor has he received any communication from the Court.
3. There was no response from the respondent to the application, and it is not clear whether or not service was effected on the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
4. It would appear, if the averments by the applicant are accurate, that there may have been an administrative lapse in the Court Registry relating to the applicant’s appeal. The documents annexed to the application include a memorandum of appeal expressed to be from Vihiga Criminal Case No 1213 of 2011 and Kakamega High Court Criminal Appeal No 54 of 2013.
5. To resolve the difficulty that the applicant finds himself in, I direct that this ruling be placed before the Deputy Registrar of this Court with a view to an investigation of the matter to establish what happened after the High Court (Dulu, J) dismissed the applicant’s appeal on July 9, 2014 as the applicant contends.
6. Thereafter the Deputy Registrar to take appropriate action with respect to the preparation of the record of appeal to facilitate the hearing of the applicant’s appeal to this Court.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023. MUMBI NGUGI……………………………JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this isa true copy of the originalDEPUTY REGISTRAR