[2002] KECA 22 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 22 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the applicant leave to file the intended appeal out of time, noting that the application was not opposed by the respondent. The absence of opposition and the applicant's request for extension of time were sufficient grounds for the court to allow the application, provided...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 22 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amechi Peter Uruozor; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 9 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amechi Peter Uruozor

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an intended appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the applicant leave to file the intended appeal out of time, noting that the application was not opposed by the respondent. The absence of opposition and the applicant's request for extension of time were sufficient grounds for the court to allow the application, provided the appeal is filed and served within 14 days of the decision.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file the intended appeal out of time.
  • The appeal must be filed and served on the respondent within 14 days of this decision.