[2019] KEELRC 2413 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2413 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, having failed to enter appearance or defend the consolidated claims, was 100% liable for the alleged unfair labour practices and unlawful termination. However, the court emphasized that monetary claims must be specifically proved. The claimants failed to provide sufficient...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2413 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amina Guyo Dalacha & 19 Others; Respondent: Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374 & 375 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Claims for underpayment, unpaid house allowance, annual leave pay, and payment in lieu of notice allowed for each claimant as specifically pleaded and proved. Costs awarded to each claimant.
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Underpayment of Wages, House Allowance Entitlement, Leave Pay, Payment in Lieu of Notice
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Underpayment of Wages House Allowance Entitlement Leave Pay Payment in Lieu of Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 80
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amina Guyo Dalacha & 19 Others

Applicant

Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent engaged in unfair labour practices and unlawfully terminated the claimants' contracts.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants were underpaid and denied statutory entitlements such as house allowance, leave pay, and payment in lieu of notice.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to the reliefs sought in the absence of a defence by the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, having failed to enter appearance or defend the consolidated claims, was 100% liable for the alleged unfair labour practices and unlawful termination. However, the court emphasized that monetary claims must be specifically proved. The claimants failed to provide sufficient computation for overtime, Sundays, and public holidays worked, so those claims were not awarded. The court awarded underpayments, unpaid house allowance, annual leave pay, and payment in lieu of notice as specifically pleaded and proved for each claimant. Costs of the suit were also awarded to each claimant.

Court Disposition

Claims for underpayment, unpaid house allowance, annual leave pay, and payment in lieu of notice allowed for each claimant as specifically pleaded and proved. Costs awarded to each claimant.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay each claimant the specified sums for underpayment, annual leave pay, payment in lieu of notice, and unpaid house allowance as set out in the judgment.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit to each claimant.