[2015] KEHC 7829 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act, including provision of necessary consents, positive assessment reports from the adoption agency, Director of Children Services, and guardian ad litem, and evidence of financial and emotional...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7829 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: AMOL; Applicant: EME; Respondent: Baby AG (to be known as BEL)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 291 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Parental Rights, Child Welfare, Legal Guardianship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMOL
Applicant
EME
Applicant
Baby AG (to be known as BEL)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether all necessary consents and reports have been properly obtained and considered.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act, including provision of necessary consents, positive assessment reports from the adoption agency, Director of Children Services, and guardian ad litem, and evidence of financial and emotional capability. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, who had bonded with the applicants and would benefit from a stable family environment. The applicants were made aware of the finality and binding nature of the adoption order, including the child.s right to inherit and the irrevocability of parental responsibility. Accordingly, the court granted...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, AMOL and EME, are allowed to adopt the child, Baby AG, who shall be known as BEL.
- RLA and SMUN are appointed legal guardians of the child in the event of the untoward happening to the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 291 OF 2014 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY AG
JUDGEMENT
1. AMOL and EME is a married couple of Kenyan and American origin, respectively. They seek to adopt a male child, known for the purposes of these proceedings as Baby AG. They have moved the court by their Originating Summons dated 5th December 2014.
2. Baby AG was born on 24th October 2013 to one GA of Vihiga County, Kenya. He was a taboo child for he was born out of an incestuous relationship. For that reason his birth mother gave him up for adoption and provided all the necessary consents. Consents were also provided by the grandmother and the father of the child. The child was admitted at the New Life Home Trust, Kisumu, at the request of the Vihiga District Children’s Officer, and the Kisumu Children’s Court formally committed him to the said institution in Protection and Care Case No. 238 of 2014 on 28th May 2014. He was placed with the applicants on 25th August 2014 for the bonding period. He was declared free for adoption by the Little Angels Network adoption agency by their certificate dated 15th August 2014.
3. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Little Angels Network, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem, HNW. These three have compiled and filed their reports in court - the Child Welfare Society of Kenya adoption society’s report is dated 15th August 2014, while that of the Director of Children’s Services is dated 16th July 2015. The guardian ad litem’s report is dated 29th July 2015. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. I note that the applicants have one biological child of their own.
4. The applicants have filed documents that demonstrate that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child appears to have bonded well with them and he considers them to be his parents.
5. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that he is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter become a useful member of the family and the society at large. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
6. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore allow the applicants’ application to adopt the child. The applicants, AMOL and EME, are hereby allowed to adopt the child, Baby AG. He shall hereafter be known as BEL. RLA and SMUN are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event of the untoward happening to the applicants. The child is hereby declared Kenyan by birth as he was born to a known Kenyan mother. The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register. The guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
W MUSYOKA
JUDGE