[2009] KEHC 764 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 764 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate they had capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor, as there was no evidence that Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba was the same entity as the registered owner, Hera Mar Adiera (ECCA). Further, the court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 764 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amos Ochieng Siaje; Applicant: Naftali Oloo Nyadhi; Applicant: Amos Otieno Saikuku; Respondent: Perez Atieno Otieno; Respondent: Silpa Oyamo; Respondent: Martin Oluoch; Respondent: Erick Cheruiyot (Oleknini)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 142 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Chamber Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Capacity to Sue, Land Ownership Disputes, Trespass, Freedom of Worship
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Interlocutory Injunctions Capacity to Sue Land Ownership Disputes Trespass Freedom of Worship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amos Ochieng Siaje

Applicant

Naftali Oloo Nyadhi

Applicant

Amos Otieno Saikuku

Applicant

Perez Atieno Otieno

Respondent

Silpa Oyamo

Respondent

Martin Oluoch

Respondent

Erick Cheruiyot (Oleknini)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Chamber Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor of the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether a temporary prohibitory injunction can issue where the act sought to be restrained has already occurred.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate they had capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor, as there was no evidence that Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba was the same entity as the registered owner, Hera Mar Adiera (ECCA). Further, the court held that the act of trespass and exclusion had already occurred, making a prohibitory injunction inappropriate; a mandatory injunction would have been the proper remedy. As the applicants neither established a prima facie case nor sought the correct relief, the application for a temporary injunction was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Chamber Application for a temporary injunction is dismissed with costs to the respondents.