[2009] KEHC 764 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate they had capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor, as there was no evidence that Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba was the same entity as the registered owner, Hera Mar Adiera (ECCA). Further, the court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 764 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Amos Ochieng Siaje; Applicant: Naftali Oloo Nyadhi; Applicant: Amos Otieno Saikuku; Respondent: Perez Atieno Otieno; Respondent: Silpa Oyamo; Respondent: Martin Oluoch; Respondent: Erick Cheruiyot (Oleknini)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 142 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Chamber Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Capacity to Sue, Land Ownership Disputes, Trespass, Freedom of Worship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amos Ochieng Siaje
Applicant
Naftali Oloo Nyadhi
Applicant
Amos Otieno Saikuku
Applicant
Perez Atieno Otieno
Respondent
Silpa Oyamo
Respondent
Martin Oluoch
Respondent
Erick Cheruiyot (Oleknini)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Chamber Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor of the suit land.
- 2 Whether a temporary prohibitory injunction can issue where the act sought to be restrained has already occurred.
- 3 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate they had capacity to sue on behalf of the registered proprietor, as there was no evidence that Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba was the same entity as the registered owner, Hera Mar Adiera (ECCA). Further, the court held that the act of trespass and exclusion had already occurred, making a prohibitory injunction inappropriate; a mandatory injunction would have been the proper remedy. As the applicants neither established a prima facie case nor sought the correct relief, the application for a temporary injunction was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Chamber Application for a temporary injunction is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
AMOS OCHIENG SIAJE
NAFTALI OLOO NYADHI
AMOS OTIENO SAIKUKU.........................................PLAINTIFFS
-VERSUS-
PEREZ ATIENO OTIENO
SILPA OYAMO
MARTIN OLUOCH
ERICK CHERUIYOT (OLEKNINI)….....................DEFENDANTS
R U L I N G
The plaintiffs/applicants are members of Evangelical Christ Church Of Africa (Ecca) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba and brought this suit and application on own behalf and on behalf of the church. They are Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer respectively of the church. Their case is that the church is the registered proprietor of land parcel no. Kanyamkago/Kawere/543 measuring approximately 0. 32 Hectares together with the developments thereon including a church building. On 10/5/2008, they alleged, the defendants/respondents jointly and severally trespassed upon this property and forcefully ejected them and other members of the church out of the church premises and have since placed the 4th respondent thereon with instructions to refuse members of the church the use of such premises and the land. By reason of this act, members of the applicants church have nowhere to worship from and have thus been denied their constitutional right of freedom of worship. The applicants sued for a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents by themselves, their servants and /or agents from trespassing on the land or interfering with their right to worship.
With the suit was filed a Chamber Application under Order 39 rules 1,2,2A 3 and 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act for a temporary injunction. The respondents did not file any Replying Affidavit or Grounds of Opposition, but filed a Statement of Defence in which they stated that they use the church in their capacities as officials of church of Christ in Africa who have an injunction barring the applicants from interfering with the suit property. It was pleaded that there exists another suit, HCCC no.21 OF 2005 at Kisumu, over the same cause of action and that a request shall be made to have the present suit dismissed. Jurisdiction of this court to hear this suit was denied. The respondents pleaded the applicants had no capacity to sue them and stated that there is no society by the name Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA). Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba.
The Title Deed for this land was annexed to the affidavit sworn by 1 st applicant to support the application. The registered proprietor is Hera Mar Adiera (ECCA). There was no effort to demonstrate that that was the same entity as Evangelical Christ Church of Africa (ECCA) Hera Mar Adiera-Oruba. This is important because the applicants capacity to sue has been brought into question. There is no prima facie evidence that the entity named in the plaint is the registered owner of the land in dispute.
Secondly, the evidence contained in the Supporting Affidavit indicates that the respondents have taken over the church and the land and excluded the applicants. The action sought to be restrained has already taken place and consequently a temporary injunction, which is prohibitory in nature, cannot do. The applicants require the talking of positive steps to eject the respondents from the land, and from their place of worship. They should have sought a mandatory injunction. (See East African Spinners Ltd And Others .V. Bedi Investment Ltd, Civil application no. 72 of 1994 at Nairobi).
In short, the application cannot be granted. The same is dismissed with costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 23rd day of October, 2009
A.O.MUCHELULE
JUDGE
23/10/2009
Before A.O.Muchelule-J
Court clerk-Mongare
Mr. Nyariki for the respondent
Court: ruling in open court.
A.O.MUCHELULE
JUDGE
23/10/2009