[2016] KEELRC 367 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 367 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent erred in using a lower salary rate for the calculation of gratuity. The correct basis for computation is the claimant's last drawn basic salary of Kshs.55,512. Applying the respondent's own formula but substituting the correct salary, the court calculated gratuity as follows:...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 367 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Andrew Abok Osiro; Respondent: Chemelil Sugar Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 100 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Terminal Benefits, Gratuity Calculation, Early Retirement, Severance Pay, Statutory Deductions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Benefits Gratuity Calculation Early Retirement Severance Pay Statutory Deductions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Abok Osiro

Claimant

Chemelil Sugar Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to additional terminal dues upon early retirement beyond what was paid by the respondent.
  2. 2 What is the correct method and rate for calculating gratuity/severance pay for the claimant's period of service.
  3. 3 Whether deductions for tax and advance payments were properly accounted for in the respondent's computation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent erred in using a lower salary rate for the calculation of gratuity. The correct basis for computation is the claimant's last drawn basic salary of Kshs.55,512. Applying the respondent's own formula but substituting the correct salary, the court calculated gratuity as follows: 22.64 years x 28 days = 633.92 days, multiplied by Kshs.55,512, divided by 21, resulting in Kshs.1,675,722.24. After deducting advance payments of Kshs.300,000 and tax withheld of Kshs.248,161.80, the net amount due to the claimant is Kshs.1,127,560.44. The court rejected the respondent's lower computation and held that the claimant is entitled to the recalculated sum, together...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.1,127,560.44 as terminal dues.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant's costs of the suit.