[2021] KECPT 273 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 273 (KLR)

The Tribunal held that the statutory procedure for deregistration or dissolution of a co-operative society is exclusively vested in the Commissioner of Co-operatives under Sections 61 and 62 of the Co-operative Societies Act. The Applicant failed to invoke or exhaust these statutory remedies, such as requesting an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECPT 273 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Githinji Mwihuri & Another; Respondent: Taifa Sacco Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 179 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies Registration, Deregistration Procedure, Administrative Exhaustion, Delay and Laches
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Cooperative Societies Registration Deregistration Procedure Administrative Exhaustion Delay and Laches

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Githinji Mwihuri & Another

Applicant

Taifa Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to cancel or recall the registration certificate of the 1st Respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant followed the statutory procedure for deregistration of a co-operative society under the Co-operative Societies Act.
  3. 3 Whether the Application is time-barred due to inordinate delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the statutory procedure for deregistration or dissolution of a co-operative society is exclusively vested in the Commissioner of Co-operatives under Sections 61 and 62 of the Co-operative Societies Act. The Applicant failed to invoke or exhaust these statutory remedies, such as requesting an inquiry or appealing to the Minister, before approaching the Tribunal. Furthermore, the Application was brought more than 20 years after the events complained of, with no satisfactory explanation for the delay. The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the orders sought, as the law prescribes a clear process for deregistration that does not involve the Tribunal at...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The Application dated 30.9.2020 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.