[2016] KEHC 2775 (KLR)
The court found that, by consent of the parties, the conservatory orders previously issued in respect of the Rikiau Adjudication Section should be extended to cover the part of the proposed Mula Adjudication Section that overlaps with Rikiau Adjudication Section. This extension ensures that no adjudication of land...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 2775 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Andrew Kaluma; Applicant: Ng'olua Mwane; Applicant: Tom Tuaruciu; Applicant: Sammy Mutia; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement, Igembe South District; Respondent: Permanent Secretary Ministry of Lands; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 9B of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Consent and Extension of Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- Consent adopted as order of the court; conservatory orders extended to overlapping area; no adjudication to proceed pending determination of petition.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Property, Land Adjudication, Conservatory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Kaluma
Applicant
Ng'olua Mwane
Applicant
Tom Tuaruciu
Applicant
Sammy Mutia
Applicant
District Land Adjudication & Settlement, Igembe South District
Respondent
Permanent Secretary Ministry of Lands
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Consent and Extension of Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conservatory orders previously issued should extend to the area of the proposed Mula Adjudication Section overlapping with Rikiau Adjudication Section.
- 2 Whether any adjudication of land should proceed in the affected sections pending determination of the petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, by consent of the parties, the conservatory orders previously issued in respect of the Rikiau Adjudication Section should be extended to cover the part of the proposed Mula Adjudication Section that overlaps with Rikiau Adjudication Section. This extension ensures that no adjudication of land will take place in the affected sections pending the hearing and determination of the petition, thereby preserving the status quo and protecting the petitioners' alleged constitutional rights under Article 40. The consent of the parties was adopted as an order of the court, making it binding and enforceable.
Court Disposition
Consent adopted as order of the court; conservatory orders extended to overlapping area; no adjudication to proceed pending determination of petition.
Orders
- The conservatory orders issued on 28/07/2014 in respect of Rikiau Adjudication Section are extended to that part of the proposed Mula Adjudication Section which overlaps into Rikiau Adjudication Section.
- There shall be no adjudication of land in the said section pending the hearing and determination of this petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
PETITION NO 9B OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
AND
FREEDOMS UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
ANDREW KALUMA ….....................................................................1ST PETITIONER
NG'OLUA MWANE............................................................................2ND PETITIONER
TOM TUARUCIU...............................................................................3RD PETITIONER
SAMMY MUTIA...................................................................................4TH PETITIONER
VS
THE DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT
IGEMBE SOUTH DISTRICT.......................................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LANDS ....2ND RESPONDENT
ATTORNEY GENERAL …..........................................................3RD RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. This Ruling relates to a Ruling delivered by this Court on 28/07/2014 concerning two applications dated 7th June, 2012 and 30th July, 2012 respectively.
2. After this Court issued apposite orders on 28th July, 2014, there was an attempt to change the name of the relevant Adjudication Section from Rikiau Adjudication Section to Mula Adjudication Section.
3. Via an order by this Court, the concerned DLASO , Mr. Munyalo, came to Court to explain the status of the situation.
4. The parties entered a consent in the following terms:-
“By consent, the conservatory orders issued on 28/07/2014 in respect of RIKIAU ADJUDICATION SECTION to extend to that part of the proposed MULA ADJUDICATION SECTION which overlaps into RIKIAU ADJUDICATION SECTION so that there should be no adjudication of land in the said section pending the hearing and determination of this petition”.
5. The Consent is adopted as an order of this Court.
6. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST , 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
CC: Lilian/Daniel
Kieti for the Respondents
Kariuki for the Petitioners
P.M.NJOROGE
JUDGE